Varelion

Nonsense.

Civil disobedience is a civic duty when the state is tyrannical.

An open secret as to who is.

Someone's name appears on it more than the word "God" does on the bible, according to the press. I think a tangible confirmation of that, and the deeds that occurred, and the fact Epstein was a Mossad agent with Russian ties would send a lot of things crumbling.

Did Bondi not say on camera that if the list was released "the system would collapse"?

> What's the goal of the US/Iran war?

Distract from the Epstein files. If you think anything else you:

    1 - Haven't been paying attention since 2008.

    2 - Are giving the administration way too much undeserved credit.

The United Monopolies of America

This move, executed when storage prices are as outrageous as they are? Again, class warfare is being waged one-sidedly.

Up vs down, always. Not surprising in the least.

White nationalists, specifically, yeah. Colloquially known as Nazi wannabes.

Gonna repost this comment I made last week, as no one interacted with its core idea. I am torn. I have bore first-hand witness to the scale of the PsyOps war waged on the American people by institutions near and far. Artroturfing to sew division to one means of another.

In all these operations, anonymity is what drives it.

I was born and raised in the anonymous internet, and tasted its freedoms. I oppose censorship. But, at this point, I have come to wonder it it would be best to always have your real-life personality attached to all you do. At least to any action that feeds an algorithm or creates something someone else can see.

It is the nature of the internet that you could never achieve absolute censorship -- and maybe anonymity should belong to the hackers and tinkers with the will and drive to hunt and craft for it.

I do not like holding this opinion, because it feels as though it is on the similar boat as that of those who 'pull up the ladder after themselves'. Increasingly, I see it as pulling shut the trapdoors to hell.

P.S. This goes without saying -- it's also the only was to defend against "ai" bots.

EDIT: I'm thoroughly convinced that my initial position here was wrong. Yeah -- easy to forget that, with, COINTELPRO, the feds are not bound by the same laws as the people, and that oligarch-controlled media will bend over backwards to give them backdoors. Thanks for all the feedback.

I am torn. I have bore first-hand witness to the scale of the PsyOps war waged on the American people by institutions near and far. Artroturfing to sew division to one means of another.

In all these operations, anonymity is what drives it.

I was born and raised in the anonymous internet, and tasted its freedoms. I oppose censorship. But, at this point, I have come to wonder it it would be best to always have your real-life personality attached to all you do. At least to any action that feeds an algorithm or creates something someone else can see.

It is the nature of the internet that you could never achieve absolute censorship -- and maybe anonymity should belong to the hackers and tinkers with the will and drive to hunt and craft for it.

I do not like holding this opinion, because it feels as though it is on the similar boat as that of those who 'pull up the ladder after themselves'. Increasingly, I see it as pulling shut the trapdoors to hell.

Capitalism at its finest.

Crony capitalism.

Worth outlining that the public isn't even benefiting as a utility while subsidizing it as though it were one -- they don't have the option to pay for it. It's a fucking clown country ran by clowns. Doesn't help when you have things like an AI company accusing another of 'stealing' from them, when they themselves committed wholesale theft on humanity's work.

No amount of evidence can convince most to believe what they don't want to believe. At this point, all you really have to do is look at policy and behavior -- the rest should just be funny icing on a woefully funny cake.

Is over-valuation an industry?

"Kids" aren't a parents property, they are their own individuals, that will, in time, make their own choice regarding their own body -- parental bigotry or not. A parent is a guardian that should enlighten and guide to the choices that would best serve the guided's goals, not the parent's. Edit: spelling, clarification.

Probably, yeah, LOL!

Damn it. Heart rate sky-rocketed from excitement.

Didn't get a message about this. I am not / was not / never would gloat about something like this. The amount of times I heard my wife say, "She is really talented, I am sure she will get something soon", while I searched and got nothing for there years left a scar in my heart.

It is worsened by the fact she, too, now, has been unemployed.

The status-quo is awful. Leeches in C-suite doing everything they can to squeeze pennies from the people, leveraging their capital to in turn abuse those in other countries.

The world needs to come together and cap how much value can be retained without reinvesting it back into the lifeblood of society.

Rockets achieved by the engineers, not C-suite. The rockets would have been here under someone else too.

Grok and its creator are unequivocally evil. Against protection of all but capital for the sake of enabling the oligarch class to further consolidate power ans abuse the working class.

All of the American workforce will feel it when that 'heroin' stops flowing.

Personal sub.

You do not become a Billionaire without abusing and taking advantage of others. It would be foolish to think that anyone with that pattern of behavior would or could be philanthropic.

The one exception I had for this was Bill Gates.

Then I looked into the past behavior of Microsoft, and what he was going with Jeffery Epstein.

I no longer hold him as an exception.

No.

I, and everyone in my social circle, go out of our way to not touch anything that was had AI significantly involved in the creation process. Hypocritically, I use AI a lot at work. I see it as using it a lot more than I am paying for, to actively sink OpenAI/Claud's bottom line.

I have a coworker that does the same. His logic was sound -- when something is heavily subsidized, abuse it.

Yeah, start by having enough to buy more influence with the right people, so they don't realize your assets are nowhere near a correct valuation.

Why would the (USA) job numbers be real? We have yes-men at every level, purposefully installed to spin any and everything in the most positive light possible. And, if not, outright fabricate numbers.

As they should. Money boils down to a finite resource, and a class of people have been flaunting their theft of the working class since the famous balcony champagne image taken during Occupy Wallstreet.

That singular image should be the poster of this Epstein era.