103 karma · joined December 31, 2015
A classic case of Chesterton’s Fence
What if 1 person owned all the money and everybody else worked for the promise of money ? Would that be enough inequality ?
"feel free to <do this thing I am actually commanding you to do>"
"I enjoy inflicting pain...your pain makes me happy...perhaps you could continue feeling the pain I inflict on you"
sorry could you explain in more detail please ?
(require [clojure.data.json :as json])
(defn xform [s]
(-> s
json/read-str
(update "foo" + 2)
json/write-str))
Your example is Clojurescript with interopBut. We all know the feeling in our own lives of suddenly waking up getting real.
(map (fn [x] (* 2 x)) [1 1 2 3 5])
=> (2 2 4 6 10)X and Y are completely unconnected and X is still bad and should be fixed.
Imagine if you went to the doctor with a fractured ankle and they said "well, it's not as bad as this baby I saw last week who was dying of sepsis. I suggest you count your blessings and deal with it"
And 6-figure salaries ? choose the value from the tail of the distribution to support your argument why don't you
"tool X doesn't cause Y, people do"
However people _act differently_ when they are using tool X. When we are driving a vehicle, we _become_ the vehicle. When we hold a tool, the tool becomes part of our body. Our brains fuse clothing and tools with the body via the senses. To the brain, the car is part of our body so that we feel the road through the suspension and tires. You can't make a conveniently neat separation.