Edit- I suppose I have just invented docking.
255 karma · joined January 14, 2017
Edit- I suppose I have just invented docking.
Your arguments seem to be of the nature of "information is information; you can't suppress it and you can't make it illegal" but that's not really what this discussion is about.
When I finally hopped on my desktop computer and did the iD tutorial, a lot of things became much easier. I learned how to add roads and buildings, and started doing so. Then I noticed that my map software (osmAnd) didn't announce my freeway exits.
To figure out how to mark freeway exits properly was terrible. I found the motorway wiki page and the motorway link page, but from those pages I didn't feel like I could tag an exit properly still. When I finally found the exit_info page things made a little more sense why they are confusing: there are conflicting ways of doing it! I started tagging freeway exits near me.
One thing that would have been helpful for me (although would probably be a bit of work to implement) would be more overview-level tools. Like "I want to..." a) add a missing building, b) tag a freeway exit, c) give addresses to these buildings, etc. Granted, some of this is already done. I suppose it's really the exit tagging that is a new example.
I also have been worrying about my changes being erroneously modified by other people, without a way to "take ownership" of an area and be notified of changes- I will take a good look at that OSMCha change set tool.
I always thought the password should be hashed client-side. Supposedly that has some problems and it would still need to be hashed server-side as well.
So I have a proposal: client-side, hash the password. Can use any hash, although hash selection does limit the password security to its output. That hash is the new password sent over the wires to the server, that does proper password handling, but it is guaranteed a password of (say for SHA-256) 256 bits; if it receives a password that doesn't look like SHA-256 output it can automatically throw it out without even checking.
The client can then store the hash-input in his password manager, and it can be literally anything that can be thrown at the SHA hash. Is this feasible?
Won't the police show up expecting an active armed gunman? Is there anything you can say to show that there is no new danger of violence without implicating yourself?
It is kind of like saying a door can be locked.
They have several tiers, including a free tier. The free tier is pretty limited; I wonder what percentage of their userbase stays there.
Adguard- for ads not caught by ghostery
Youtube Magic Actions- Makes the youtube experience way better. Although the recent changes to youtube seems to have temporarily broken it :(
Seriously though. So annoying.
I mean, using a signature as a legal, "I was there and I approved this document" is all fine and dandy, but for authentication? There are much better methods
This is why the charge to the card goes through before you have to sign anything. Even on pos systems where you sign on the screen, I get the text message notifying me that my card was charged even before I start to sign on the screen.
But taking a look at your first link, it appears to already not be in force anymore? For the same reasons that the new recommendation is being drafted- government surveillance violates fundamental rights to privacy.
"On 8 April 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union declared the Directive 2006/24/EC invalid for violating fundamental rights. The Council's Legal Services have been reported to have stated in closed session that paragraph 59 of the European Court of Justice's ruling "suggests that general and blanket data retention is no longer possible".[15] A legal opinion funded by the Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament finds that the blanket retention data of unsuspicious persons generally violates the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, both in regard to national telecommunications data retention laws and to similar EU data retention schemes (PNR, TFTP, TFTS, LEA access to EES, Eurodac, VIS)."