Trufa

Sure, I have to change a lot of contexts, and each contexts has a lot of sections.

So basically I have

- A session for dev

   - each tab is a service

       - each service has a pane, vim, claude code, runner (npm run dev, go run etc)

- A session for devops

    - vim
    - staing
    - prod

- Other services that are not so day to day -vim

- Misc

I'd be pretty lost without my pretty crazy zellij setup.

[flagged]

I ask then unironically then, am I imagining that models are great when they start and degrade over time?

I've had this perceived experience so many times, and while of course it's almost impossible to be objective about this, it just seem so in your face.

I don't discard being novelty plus getting used to it, plus psychological factors, do you have any takes on this?

Can you be more specific than this? does it vary in time from launch of a model to the next few months, beyond tinkering and optimization?

Yeah, it’s a shame we’ve all grown so jarred, I do see this better than nothing.

In this animal farm Orwellian cycle we’ve been going through, at least they start here, unlike others.

I for one commend this, but stay vigilant.

Perhaps next time be nicer.

I mean, I imagine this being a mess, each country having it's own rules

- maybe it's legal but regulated

- does size matter?

- does it matter when you cross a border?

- do you have to announce?

- does it matter how high you fly it?

- are the International norms?

- are there regulatory bodies?

Can someone give me some notes on the legality of this?

Are there any good svg free deck designs out there? Like the traditional looking ones?

It is very much fun! Chaotic and definitely dangerous but a fun little experiment of the boundaries.

It’s definitely not it it’s final form but it’s showing potential.

The HN crow is anti AI, so yeah, the sentiment is gonna be insecure and lack luster.

The thing ins pretty incredible, it's of course the very early stages but it's showing it's potential, it seem to show that the software can have control of itself, I've asked it to fix itself and it did successfully a couple of times.

Is this the fine form? of course not!

Is it dangerous as it is, fuck yeah!

But is it fun in a chaotic version? absolutely, I have it running in cheap hetzners and running for some discord and whatsapp and it can honestly be useful at times.

I have absolutely no insight knowledge, but I think it's not a bad assumption to have that, it's costly to run the models, when they release a new model they assume that cost and give per user more raw power, when they've captured the new users and wow factor, they start reducing costs by reducing the capacity they provide to users. Rinse and repeat.

I'm glad I'm not the only one.

Say what you will about Macs, I ain't no fanboy, but from this side of the fence, I had forgotten that drivers were a thing.

Most of the times they mean the amazement of just even considering that move a couple of moves ahead and not discarding that branch.

But yes, a true gambit could be considered something that's objectively bad, but humanly makes sense.

This is fantastic, nostalgic of the old internet days of messy creative stuff.

That's not what OP is asking, he's asking how do you have two separate e2e encrypted apps that can interact.

Almost no positive comments. I for one find this a great try, a very interesting project. I hope this kind of experiments gain track.

Nice, just today, I was trying ngrok, localtunnel, and a couple more, they all were pretty slow, fair enough for the free tier, but I'm interested in knowing is there something architecturally hard or expensive with having fast traffic?

I love this and will definitely try it.

I would honestly love to have it with a dockerized version with something like caddy that manages ssl so I can basically just run a docker command have it up and running.

Thank you very much! Great stuff will give it a try.

Damn, I didn't notice it at all, but now it's quite obvious, it feels like stuff like this is taking the enjoyment out of consuming anything.

Is this an alternative to https://mastra.ai/docs

How would it compare?

How will you handle for example if someone uses this for crypto stuff that's against TOS is hetzner.

This is fascinating, but the experiment seems to fail in being a fair comparison of how much knowledge can we have from that time in data vs now.

As a thought experiment I find it thrilling.

Did you mean GB or TB otherwise you’re in the very low end of log volume

I thought he was joining Bryan Johnson

Nebula | Multiple roles | Remote/Onsite NYC preferred | Full-time

Nebula is building a modular blockchain stack to make on-chain finance faster, fairer, and more efficient than off-chain. The stack has 3 parts:

1. Execution environment – combines Rust + Sovereign SDK for highly performant, expressive private apps (e.g. solving latency asymmetry in exchanges). 2. Privacy protocol – blends cryptography + privacy hardware for verifiable, fast programmable privacy. 3. Nebula Exchange – a hyper-performant exchange using batch auctions + private orders to eliminate latency asymmetry and guarantee best prices. We’re hiring ambitious engineers to join the core team:

- Frontend (React/TS/Next.js) – focus on architecture, design systems, interactivity, realtime apps, Figma → production.

- Backend (Rust/Go) – core infra + SDK integration.

Requirements: detail-obsessed, independent problem solver, thrives in chaos, good communicator, can work ET hours. Nice to have: exp. in financial exchanges, realtime data-heavy apps, web3. Note: workload can be intense (sometimes 80+ hrs/wk).

If this challenge excites you, send CV → nebulaexchangejobs@gmail.com

Yeah, when it becomes cool to be anti AI or anti anything in HN for that matter, the takes start becoming ridiculous, if you just think back a couple of years, or even months ago and where we're now and you can't see it, I guess you're just dead set on dying on that hill.

I think I've tried every combination herbs possible, you have to whittle to her and the to he, and then there's nothing, what do you mean?

I feel like people will upvote anything negative. This is not much a limitation of npm, there's nothing intrinsically wrong with npm that lead to this decision, this is more a pragmatic way of allowing progressive change of a library that introduced a lot of braking changes.

I don't understand what we're discussing. Am I supposed to defend the usefulness of the internet?