646 karma · joined January 12, 2015
http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1626392
A common criticism seems to be that he has a huge ego.
https://instant.io/#a7f829dadaea43160bac71dbda4d0f7c4998d22a
Also, could you elaborate? I do wish to understand why, if I was wrong.
Or is the technology behind that unique?
Then again, don't get me wrong, I do think that the government needs to do more wealth redistribution.
...
>Going as far as talking about a DDOS attack on Twitter
Also, that G8 article you linked has a full page MTGOX ad on page 8. Kinda ironic huh?
Okay, enough with the low hanging fruits, now some serious stuff.
I don't see how Bitcoin enthusiasts can trivially brush off the criminal activities connected to Bitcoin. The public at large doesn't care about your shiny little toy - but they do if it's used by criminals. The article specifically mentions child pornography. Now how can CP be distributed? Tor and hidden services. But how is someone going to pay / profit from it? There was no easy solution - then comes Bitcoin, and suddenly people can be absolutely untraceable on the internet. You cannot simply ignore this. You have to acknowledge it, and then a) provide some form of solution (kinda contradicts its principles) or b) argue that it isn't as important compared to potential benefits of Bitcoin.
I’m not arguing about whether there should or should not be regulation, but about the purpose of regulation - it’s rarely about ‘ethics’. If you look at the SEC enforcements, most of them are about fraud or about a breach of duty. Fraud - you’re not allowed to lie, that is pretty self explanatory. Breach of duty - someone else places trust in you to act in their best interests, and you violate that trust. This is broad and can be applied in variety of ways, but a duty has to be established. Other than these two and some other exceptions, you’re free to do whatever you want - and that’s to maximise your profits.
Financial regulation is not and has never been about ethics. It’s about providing a market for exchange, without fear of being lied to, or worry about your agents[0] not acting in your interests. If you’re looking for equity or want to solve problems with corporations, you need to do it somewhere else.
The whole point of finance is maximizing profits; I think that people need to understand and accept this for us to have a meaningful discussion.
>Correct The Record is a strategic research and rapid response team designed to defend Hillary Clinton from baseless attacks.
>If the cubs continued to show aggressive or evasive responses, even after significant human contact, they were discarded from the population – meaning they were made into fur coats.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_x7xNgfhbbWo/TLxegWcfLTI/AAAAAAAAAx...
Also, using US as an example is incredibly hypocritical since they have a large military presence all over the world - in way more regions than China.
Why is the US doing this? Could it be to 'protect trade'?