All of these suggestions which seek to reduce someone else's carbon output somehow, seem fraught with moral hazard or other significant problems.
1,387 karma · joined January 13, 2014
All of these suggestions which seek to reduce someone else's carbon output somehow, seem fraught with moral hazard or other significant problems.
I do wonder what happens to the solutions after that, I hope the solution itself isn't very dangerous
This is impoprtant because if you are on-call, you are working, and if it is during a holiday, then that is one less holiday for you.
This could actually be pretty good too. People would be much more willing to cover for others on holidays
The other reason is that it is better! You can actually get an induction stove to heat up faster than a gas stove, if it is wired properly
On the other hand, most people do not take Vitamin D supplements, even if they should.
But this is not taken into account in the Death Probability column, is it? Because we also see in that column, consistently better outcomes for women, even for the very youngest age groups
As if it were so easy!
#ifndef SEED
#define SEED __DATE__
#endifIt is the method of last resort, really. Ideally, people have enough success in their life that they do not have to resort to crime. If that fails we have some other protections: we lock our doors, etc. Lastly, if people still commit crime we try to prosecute them