As for the community, most seem to dislike high resistance switches, which is why my preference for MX Clears leaves me with few brands to purchase from, and my dream ideal of a higher resistance Topre will probably never happen.
1,050 karma · joined July 18, 2010
As for the community, most seem to dislike high resistance switches, which is why my preference for MX Clears leaves me with few brands to purchase from, and my dream ideal of a higher resistance Topre will probably never happen.
https://www.infoq.com/presentations/Simple-Made-Easy/
https://www.infoq.com/presentations/Are-We-There-Yet-Rich-Hi...
If you're going to watch any of these, at least watch "The Value of Values".
(def fizzbuzz-nums (range 1 101))
(defn fizz? [n] (zero? (% n)))
(defn buzz? [n] (zero? (% n 5)))
(defn fizzbuzz? [n] (and (fizz? n) (buzz? n)))
(defn fizzbuzz [n]
(cond (fizzbuzz? n) "FizzBuzz"
(fizz? n) "Fizz"
(buzz? n) "Buzz"
:else n)))
(def fizzbuzz-list (map fizzbuzz fizzbuzz-nums))
(apply println fizzbuzz-list)The trick to lefty pens is to get BOLD tips!
When you have a thin needle-like tip, as you know, you end up stabbing or scratching the paper. But if the tip is either a big round rolling ball or nib, then it glides across the paper on its roundy edge.
I can definitely recommend the Lamy Safari with a 1.0 bold tip, or any Pilot ballpoint pen with a 1.0 bold tip. (I carry a Pilot Precision 1.0 Bold ballpoint pen with me at all times.)
This is news to me, but I'm not in "the Security Community". I can't find anything that corroborates this. Why do you say that?
> I wonder what is the reasoning behind this? To escape the ambiguity during joins?
Most justifications center around the "USING" clause which can only be used on matching column names:
select user_id,
username,
comment
from users
inner join
comments using (user_id);
Versus `on user.id = comments.user_id`.The argument against this is that the USING clause really mucks up the result set columns by unifying those that match the USING clause.
Yes, it gives some compile-time-only type safety in certain places, but it doesn't provide state safety like ClojureScript. I'm more worried about state/reference-based bugs creeping into my code versus type related issues, which I'll be checking via unit tests anyway. On top of that, it doesn't protect you from the usual JavaScript pitfalls since it's backwards compatible, including the bad parts.
Or am I missing something here? Is it popular because it lets you directly upgrade existing JavaScript files? I can see that being a big draw. Small and gradual improvement, yeah?
- Add a time to reminders, as they're currently only due date reminders. (Nearly useless, really, other than appearing on your calendar.)
- Merge Tasks remidners with the Google Assistant reminders, and the Google Keep reminders. Three different places to have Googley reminders, all separate.
- Re-arranging the task lists. (You can only re-arrange tasks on a list, but not the lists themselves. This is a basic feature that is surprisingly missing.)
- Add a widget for the Android home screen so you can keep a specific list in full view all the time. (This is kinda' a personal wishlist item.)
- Add Google Assistant voice command support to create tasks, review tasks, etc. (Super useful while driving and remembering something.)
- Add tagging to list items, and a search function so you can have "meta-lists" like "All Items Due Today" without having to maintain items across lists. (This would allow you implement the GTD methodology.)
- Add minimal per-list collaboration of some sort, similar to Keep. (I guess it's already available for Keep, so maybe not super relevant.)
1: The only JS on the page is an IE conditional comment adding an HTML5 shim script, and the Disqus comment embedding script. Then there's the Google analytics that gets pulled in from font references and I guess Facebook JS via the Disqus embed.
cd HKCU:
ls -r -i *HeidiSQL*
Or if you really want to use the match operator, regex, or other expression, you can still pipe it through the Where-Object alias: ls -r | ? {$_.Name -match "HeidiSQL"}[1]: http://www.slate.com/articles/podcasts/lexicon_valley/2018/0...
The fancy version costs money, yes, but the community edition is free and Apache licensed. Here's the source code: https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community
> is there another major cause for most of the world drifting to the inferior choice?
I've used both Eclipse and IntelliJ, as well as JetBrain's "ReSharper" tool in Visual Studio, and while the UI is obviously different, and in some ways better, some ways worse than Eclipse, the actual functionality and feature set of IntelliJ is clearly superior to Eclipse, especially all the refactoring and code smell tools.
The feature list is just incredible and constantly increasing: https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/whatsnew/
Also, IdeaVim is way superior to Eclim, if you care about Vim keybindings and modal editing.
This is the entire ethos of the "AI Revolution" in tech. The algorithm "knows what is best for you". This will only get worse with more "AI" being applied to more tech.
When they got rid of keyboards.
Then your other mentioned features, the SD cards and batteries left quickly after, but the keyboard was the first to go. Now I struggle with typing in frustration, whereas I used to be able to type full paragraphs without even looking at the phone, including backspaces, on my old WinMo, BlackBerry, and early Android phones.
It looks like even with an unfiltered world, echo chambers still evolve. It's the nature of communities.
Then when we've all sunk into all these convenient cloud services and "easy to use" disposable devices, we'll have lost all of our privacy and power. The corporations will get regulated, and then the government will have access and control of the systems.
And yet we'll have people argue that these open source and federated/distributed systems are "too confusing" and "not practical" and that we shouldn't even try to avoid this future.
So yeah, not cool.
That and RevoUinstaller. You run RevoUinstaller then CCleaner, and maybe a reboot in between, and you've really removed an app. (The paid version of Revo is even cooler, as it will let you log the files generated during an install, and then on uninstall, it'll make sure to remove all the files and directories you had previously logged.)
Well, that and it was Google.com's "chrome".