Serial technical co-founder / engineering teams builder. Avid sailor and traveler. Hedonist and bon vivant. Fine arts, wine and food aficionado. Currently in Belgrade, Serbia.
Contact me via Telegram: https://t.me/SergeAx
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/sergeax; my proof: https://keybase.io/sergeax/sigs/wBwfWFxdZgBllPeeofjNjFFl2-4dyvNPWRhJ9JnVgMI ]
Interestingly, both of your points could be addressed by adopting a company-wide policy: if a meeting has no agenda attached, it is optional to join. Or, in short, "no agenda - no attenda."
I am and was in touch with several multimillionaires and billionaires, and in no way are they "regular people". One common trait is a gross intolerance for failing to execute their plans. I am not saying that it is necessary bad, but the amount of resources they may throw on their dissatisfaction is often frightening.
I wonder, would it be funny if it turned out that this technique dramatically increases the effectiveness of any prompt? Not by 10-15%, as in "I'll give you a big tip" or "If you do this task poorly, I'll get fired," but by three times?
I don't get the logic behind the FFmpeg stance. They have no obligation to fix any bugs, and they are not liable if someone exploits those vulnerabilities, as per the license. Thus, the parties interested in fixes are free to patch bugs at their own expense or pay someone else to do it. Anyways, fixes will end up in the FFmpeg codebase or in other GNU-licensed fork of it, available to cherry-pick.
Here's a handy recipe for your friend: go to a blind tasting. This way, they will probably find out that they really can't tell a $15 coffee from a $150, or a $500 machine from a $ 5,000 one.
Works like a charm with wine: I know a lot about it, can maintain a conversation for hours, but will never buy anything above $50/bottle except for a gift.
I would understand people's craving for pixel perfection, smooth 120Hz scrolling, etc, if we had nothing else to want. But I believe that we are now in a totally different era when overall software quality is degrading and we lack some basic stuff here and there, even in the apps of multi-billion-valued companies. In this situation UX should be much more important than UI.
I am not a Microsoft hater; in fact, I have been using Microsoft products since MS-DOS 3.3. But Outlook and its ecosystem are a horrible shit show and an indicator of terrible decision-making.
Google Workspace is an infinitely better productivity framework; there's no space for discussion here.
Smartphones aren't getting cheaper and generally aren't getting better for the last 3-5 years. In fact, I hated replacing my 4-year-old perfectly functioning smartphone just because its battery degraded and the charging socket wore out.
The replacement was about 15% more expensive, inflation-adjusted, BTW.
Google is lacking a coherent product vision. They are trying to foot their models' output everywhere, creating chaos. Meanwhile, Gemini chats are not synced between web and Android app, and this is ridiculous.
Actually, the "he looked for a couch a week ago, let's show him all the couch ads we have" is still the best strategy in terms of CPI/CPC. And also a pretty cheap one. This is why they are doing it, not because they are dumb. It may enrage some, but what would they do, quit browsing the Internet?
> I can give my money to excellent artists directly
No, you can't, or at least not to any artist.
Although I wholeheartedly support the idea of paying directly to the artist and even commissioning specific pieces, many "blue chips" are selling only via galleries/dealers to ditch management and bargaining and keep prices consistent.