That said, I'd be curious to know how long it'd take a device like this to decrypt "secure" AES256 text.
4,506 karma · joined March 3, 2007
https://www.linkedin.com/in/samodio https://tkmx.odio.dev/user/so
That said, I'd be curious to know how long it'd take a device like this to decrypt "secure" AES256 text.
Long: To say that a firm's equity is "underpriced" is to say that the firm believes it is expensive (risk-adjusted), compared to it's debt.
This implies a two things:
* Asymmetric information - that the firm knows something the market doesn't.
* That the firm is at a sub-optimal weighted average cost of capital, and can reduce the cost of its capital by restructuring.
As found by MR Leary at Duke and cited by 600 others[1], firms resolve this situation by rebalancing their capital structure. One way to do this is to issue debt at a low interest rate to buy back the firm's "expensive" stock.
The Modigliani–Miller theorem that you reference does indeed argue that capital structures don't matter and that rebalancing shouldn't need to occur. However the theory doesn't apply in practice since it assumes the absence of asymmetric information, taxes, and the presence of an efficient market [2].
1. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=179408952930709446...
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modigliani%E2%80%93Miller_theor...
I'm sorry you feel this way. I agree that HN needs less vitriol like this, but I can understand where you're coming from.
Expect an 'about page' at some point in the near future. In the meantime here are a few links that might help you learn more about the company, the team, and the product (I found most of them by googling "Freshplum" and "gethelium"):
* http://www.crunchbase.com/company/freshplum
* http://www.linkedin.com/search/fpsearch?keywords=freshplum
* http://thenextweb.com/insider/2012/11/01/freshplum-launches-...
* http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/01/freshplum-goes-after-small-...
* Demo: http://sam.odio.com/2012/10/31/buy-me-beer/
* http://allthingsd.com/20110621/sam-odio-i-left-facebook-to-r...
And, if there's any more information you'd like before signing up, there's always email. Our addresses are in our profiles.
Regarding the demo: we're planning on adding one to the home page. Until then I added the button to my blog: http://sam.odio.com/2012/10/31/buy-me-beer/
It's easier to drop the price (or give volume discounts) than raise it.
It's basically an easy way to add a shopping cart and check-out flow to a website. Think of the small business that's not tech-savvy but wants to sell a few products (or a service) on their site.
Design was by Michael Yuan, the same designer that designed Divvyshot.
In their latest quarter (Q2 FY2013) "Cost of Revenue" made up $68,036,000 on revenue of $101,267,000. Of that, "Content acquisition costs" were $60,522. That means royalties make up a whopping 60% of all revenue. They're not making a profit and have lost money in FY2012 and FY2011.
0. http://investor.pandora.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=227956&p=iro... (see Historical Financials).
The situation Vinod describes would therefore only exist if founders either:
a) Didn't agree with him about the role of an early investor, or
b) Were not optimizing for their company's success.
------ edit ------
It's also worth nothing that if (a) above were common and I were a price-sensitive value-add investor I'd give interviews exactly like the one Vinod gave to Techcrunch.
I'd attempt to convince entrepreneurs that they shouldn't focus on valuations and should instead focus on the benefits investors (like my firm) provide. This isn't an uncommon argument (though it normally happens behind closed doors). Google Ventures, for example, is known to make it [1].
1. http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomtaulli/2012/07/19/when-fundin...
This is FUD, just with different actors.
That said, we'd love more than anyone to make this available to as many people as possible. The team is pulling long hours to make that happen. We're just trying to do it in a responsible, methodical way.
I'd love to see you or any other HNer try us out. If you sell stuff online and are interested in an analytics tool to help you understand your business, feel free to drop me a line. My email is in my HN profile. After I understand your needs I'll tell you honestly whether we can help.
I felt like there must be a better way, where econ & math is used instead of intuition.
Freshplum grew out of that. After building the company to solve that need we realized that analytics can help online businesses in several different ways - not just pricing. We now how a more holistic focus on helping companies understand their online business through analytics.
1. http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/per_visas_orders_square...
2. Note to the NSA or any other government agency reading my public social network comments: It's a shame I have to post this disclaimer, but I have no intention of defrauding supporters of any political campaign (simply discussing a known security flaw). Also, Hacker News is not a news site for crackers.
Duplex scanner.
However the discussion itself (and not the technique used to start it) probably doesn't add much to HN so I'd consider this spam.
Many seem to consider it to be the lowest salary where one can live comfortably in the valley (allowing one to take risk without going into debt).
Sell-offs (especially large ones) don't indicate that hoarding hasn't taken place. In fact, if hoarding wasn't taking place I'd expect low variability in trading volume (since the currency would be used by a number of parties for small transactions). A large sell-off implies to me that a large amount of value has just transferred from one set of hoarders (investors?) to another. Either that, or someone just made a huge donation to WikiLeaks...
That "olive branch" comment wasn't intended to be negative. I was saddened by his reply. To address your point: I am not looking for a personal confrontation...just wanting to reach out and make sure he's OK.
Fwiw, anyone who knows me know I don't have a holier-than-thou attitude (though I took one for this post). This was mostly meant as an edgy/controversial twist to the social experiment: how do peoople react when someone takes the money (which is a public good) and imposes their own morals on it (even if it's for good)?
That would imply that the card is currently being used as intended.