RenThraysk

I misspoke, should have said end to end.

Being a developer and implemented both, I know. Maybe I just mispoke.

A messenger just refuses to upgrade. So Alice who was sending Bob messages with no problem yesterday, today breaks. So back to having to use the same messenger.

So no guarantee of interoperability.

But future messaging apps shouldn't be getting less secure.

Imagine there is a break in a cryptographic algorithm, say AES256-CBC. Now can I replace it in my messaging app, without having to coordinate with every other messaging app provider? Suddenly governments have a lever to prevent adoption of securer standards.

Er, WhatsApp is based on Noise for client server protocol, and Signal protocol for peer to peer encryption. Both were open standards before WhatsApp implemented them.

Is this an indirect attack on the encryption... seems to be.

Distilling still easier and more efficient than condensing water out of the air.

Then you don't need to extract water from the air. Just make it potable.

Fundamentally flawed idea. Places that need water are the most are dry, they have no humidity, as there is little to no water in the air.

It's built into Google Lens. Use it occasionally to send files over wifi to phone, with webwormhole.

US should start make solar panels then. Worryingly even LG (Korea) recently announced they are withdrawing from solar panel manufacturing.

Even LED have more efficient designs, Philips makes the Dubai Lamp specifically for Dubai but you cannot buy them outside of Dubai.

https://www.mea.lighting.philips.com/consumer/dubai-lamp

Believe an IR beacon was placed on the building by a local.

ISO pricing came up in a discussion had elsewhere recently.

Particularly about this "Ships and marine technology -- Survival equipment for survival craft and rescue boats" https://www.evs.ee/en/iso-18813-2006 About potential life saving equipment, and it's behind a paywall. Seems wrong, and the US Coast Guard are starting to reference it. Related concern was the US Coast Guard are no longer certifying certain equipment, so it moves the burden from USCG to private individuals & companies to ensure their safety equipment meets the required standards. No doubt insurance companies will look into whether the equipment meets the standard, and if not then refuse to pay out.

TRUNCATE in a few databases effectively drops the table, and recreates it.

If typing in an interactive session usually use a specific user account for it, with minimal set of privileges. And wouldn't have the DROP privilege or any other DDL statement privilege. DDL would be scripted out, tested and ran using another user account that had only privileges on specific databases it needed.

With databases, start a transaction first, then update, and look at the number of rows affected. If it's an oh shit moment, rollback, if not commit.

Says more about the person sending the memo, than anyone else. And doesn't inspire confidence in their abilities.

You mean like public libraries?

Erm, math/bits package OnesCount() family of functions?

https://golang.org/pkg/math/bits/#OnesCount

go compiler output...

0x0020 00032 ($GOROOT/src/math/bits/bits.go:115) FMOVD R0, F0

0x0024 00036 ($GOROOT/src/math/bits/bits.go:115) VCNT V0.B8, V0.B8

0x0028 00040 ($GOROOT/src/math/bits/bits.go:115) VUADDLV V0.B8, V0

Why does it use SHRQ, ANDQ & MOVB, instead of a BT & SETB ?

How does the caddy instances on the home network side get certificates for accessing directly from the LAN?

I think you are arguing from bad faith. Social Sciences has problems and it seems unwilling to do better.

You had to be shamed publicly and widely. People have a right to know social sciences are this broken.

All papers get critical responses and suggestions for improvement. That proves nothing other than the submitted papers were considered to have some merit, and still possible inclusion in the various issues.

The problem is people (a journalist and RealPeerReview on twitter initially) identified quite a few of the hoax papers. And that does suggest there is a bubble within the field that has departed from usefulness and reality.

There is a problem within social sciences. Whatever is happening in hard science journals doesn't change that fact.

It did prove that the only people capable of pointing out there were problems with the hoax papers are people generally critical of the social sciences. That alone demonstrates a problem.

That's why the experiment ended early.

PZ Meyers is a doxing buffoon.