369 karma · joined June 22, 2024
99% of the daily rage sessions happened before it was even released
Using it for the OS partition is not very well supported right now though (for a consumer), installing etc. works fine, but DISM doesn't support ReFS so adding features generally doesn't work
This does also show it not changing in other benchmarks, but I don't have a LNL laptop myself to test things myself, just going off of what people I know tested. It's still also balanced so best performance power plan would I assume push it to use its cores normally - on windows laptops I've owned this could be done with a hotkey.
> Lunar Lake uses TSMC N3 for compute tile. There is no node advantage.
LNL is N3B, Apple is on N3E which is a slight improvement for efficency
> Yet, M4 is 42% faster in ST and M5 is 50% faster based on Geekbench 6 ST.
Like I said they simply have a better architecture at the moment, which also more focused on client that GB benchmarks because their use cases are narrower. If you compare something like optimized SIMD Intel/AMD will come out on top with perf/watt.
And I'm not sure why being behind the market leader would make one lose faith in Intel, their most recent client fuckup was raptor lake instability and I'd say that was handled decently. For now nothing else that'd indicate Windows ARM getting to Apple level battery performance without all of the vertical integration
ETA: looking at things the throttling behaviour seems to be very much OEM dependent, though the tradeoffs will always remain the same
LNL should only power throttle when you go to power saver modes, battery life will suffer when you let it boost high on all cores but you're not getting great battery life when doing heavy all core loads either way. Overall MT should be better on Panther lake with the unified architecture, as afaik LNLs main problem was being too expensive so higher end high core count SKUs were served by mobile arrow lake. And we're also getting what seems to be a very good iGPU while AMD's iGPUs outside of Strix Halo are barely worth talking about
ST is about the same as AMD. Apple being ahead is nothing out of the ordinary since their ARM switch, as there's the node advantage, what I mentioned with the OS, and just better architecture as they plainly have the best people at the moment working at it
The new intel node seems to be kinda weaker than tsmc's going by the frequency numbers of the CPUs, but what'll matter the most in a laptop is real battery life anyway
Enterprise likes to layer multiple invasive security products though that'll do a lot worse than defender
There already was scaling back for dram and and production post COVID, where I believe nand was being sold close to cost because of oversupply
Significantly increasing supply is also a huge multi year investment into a new fab that'd likely not pay out when the artificial demand breaks down.
Framework makes sense if you're going in on the sustainability idea, but other than that it's really just an expensive laptop that's not compelling against its competitors
I much prefer their ides to say vscode, but their development has been a mess for a while with half-assed implementations and long standing bugs
They could in theory do on package dram as faster first level memory, but I doubt we'll see that anytime soon on desktop and it probably wouldn't fit under the heat spreader
There's a lot of misleading information in what they publish, plagiarism, and I believe some information that wouldn't be possible to get without breaking NDAs
I overclocked my system for fun and for ram you'd run 2-3 different tests to be able to call it stable with some confidence, as they all have different access patterns and r/w ratios.
Memtest86/+ are usually seen as worse compared to the other tests like say or karhu ram test or testme5, but those also need an OS to run and in the rare chance only some region of memory is faulty could miss it
For personal a cheap vps will end up costing around the same as something you can do on your own, without the risk of messing up your machine/network from a vulnerable endpont
I've been moving away from their tools with this and the resistance to implement/merge useful things that basically everyone wants
You can use water or air internally but then to get rid of the heat from the facility there aren't many choices. You either put it into the air which is cheap, into nearby water bodies which has other environmental concerns, or into the ground which is expensive. The air is the simplest, cheapest solution and using water for evaporative cooling in dryer climates makes it even better