1,267 karma · joined June 24, 2020
Remote hands set up the hardware for me and replace failed hardware. The service is so rarely needed that it's basically free.
In recent years I've started to rent the hardware I want as I want more frequent changes. I tell my host what hardware I want and they'll acquire it and install it.
If you're running very old hardware that you can't even buy replacement drives for then you are doing something very wrong.
Need to scale fast? Then I don't have to wait for servers to arrive, I use their cloud offering that's in the same network.
I agree that it's a solved problem, but the solution to anything somewhat permanent is not the cloud. It's not really any harder to run your own hardware.
Either that or people should stop linking to broken pages.
Are datacaps normal on fibre in the US? I was first thinking it was mobile data. 1 Gbps 5G with 100 GB usage before the speed is reduced to 3 Mbps for the rest of the month is ~37 USD in Norway. As for fiber, ~100 USD is a normal price for 1 Gbps no matter how much data you use.
You're running on the same host, so there might be exploits that allow you to break free, but that goes for most other "serverless" solutions too.
Stopping tracking by the way of more invasive tracking like extracting content from emails is not a good thing.
What kind of things are you having problems with in regards to backwards compatibility?
The way I see it, it's identical to code, it just involves more moving parts.
> If two experts designed the same system, you would see two different designs, beautiful and aesthetic in their own way and both as “correct” as the other (and with the accompanying justifications to support them).
That is nonsense. Systems can be optimally designed too, just like code. Even if you have two systems that both meet the requirements for features, performance, reliability, and cost, one is usually objectively better by surpassing the requirements more than the other.
Would you like solution A that is identical to solution B in every way, but can be run with half the hardware, or do you want solution B? Of course you would want solution A.
Self hosting is rarely complicated. It's also easy to achieve better performance and lower cost in many situations.
Nearly all my time is spent on developing my own software, so it's not like I make infrastructure changes every month. I set up a deployment pipeline that deploys it the way I want, and then I don't touch it until my infrastructure needs to change.
So I'm usually not even using application containers in production, Docker is just a simple way to simulate production services so that anyone can run a single command and have a complete dev environment.
Docker swarm works well with compose.
Is this just the US being far behind when it comes to heat pumps or something?
Norway have a lower amount of excess deaths related to the winter than most others countries, even much warmer countries like e.g. Spain.
Being outdoors isn't an issue. It's not that cold in Norway. It's Norway, not Antarctica...
You should still have someone to keep an eye on it when using cloud solutions. And when you already have someone to keep an eye on it there's a good chance you might be better off managing the infrastructure yourself.