NHQ

I learned some things from this video. Might need to get me a Shive Wave Machine now.

Can you apply css transformations to that?

Very nice. Forked!

This is what I was looking for. Thanks!

I hope this is legit!

I really like that you have taken the typing out of syntax. Syntaxes could be distilled into icons and be put out of the line thought. I'd like to code like that.

He is right about one thing: every device should be able to download and run html apps natively.

very nice

This is awesome right here.

Very nice. forked!

Pretty nice. Forked!

Is this it for the demo, or do you plan to continue development?

DAAAAMMN thats a fine definition.

Pretty neat. Is this rating based purely on the game's principles, or does the AI algorithms use--for controlling the Ghosts, or creating the stages--have a bearing on the Game's hardness/completeness?

I built my own 3-tiered, sit-down or stand-up desk, link to pic below.

Seated, the monitor is the right height for me, so as to keep my head up and neck straight. When I want to switch to standing, I just move the keyboard to the top level. I make the switch once or twice per day. And I can sit cross legged on the lowest platform (I dont like bucket/office chairs).

That was v0.1 of the desk, constructed in a few hours. the As you can see it is not production ready :p

http://blog.angelinegragasin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/...

More and more you are compelled to own the corporation that represents you in business. So we can get around onerous government regulation. We are taxed to pay for the private-public crony-capitalism complex. It may be costly or unconscionable for me to hire you--or to be hired and paid as an individual taxpayer--and let that money go freely into corruption. But we can hire the other's company. How your company uses its money and treats its employees is your business.

Where can one get a database of IP locations any more? ipinfodb no longer offers a download of their data.

Contrary to the bloggers report, there is more info and source available:

http://ftm.ircam.fr/index.php/A_brief_introduction_to_FTM

http://imtr.ircam.fr/imtr/Gesture_Follower

The author's results and auto-ratio-maker are based on an assumption ("educated guess") he makes in the middle about the ratio between line-height and line-width:

"With the help of basic mathematical modeling, you can make an educated guess that the relationship between the optimal line height and line width is exponential. Here’s the simplest equation to express that:"

The author chooses to square height to determine the "optimal" width, as the "simplest equation to express" the exponential.

But obviously the best educated guess would be W = Lh^GOLDEN RATIO

I don't like to play contrarian when the room is full of them ;), but I was just reading some slides from a conference about understanding various costs in javascript and how to optimize, and it was put forth that contextualizing with call() and apply() are quite costly, more costly than one or two "upward" context traversals in search of e.g. the "self" variable you created to point to the top context (var self = this). And arguments look-ups can be costly as well. I can't find the damn slides or website now tho, sry.

Hey, this article is better than a rant, if you don't know much about what's going on with the RFC, but are using websockets anyway. :D

Everything you send up or down is a message, or a packet, and the size of that cannot exceed the size of pipe (with bottlenecks or intermediary restrictions). Call 'em Quantum Packets, or a stream, or a message. The websocket protocol, as imagined by this developer, is meant to allow a continuous lot of Quantum Packs to "flow", without the application level overhead of parsing a bunch of protocol, headers, wackness. I want to get the data into my applications AFAP, cuz I still have to transcode it, analyze it, and all else to make the baby dance.

What we need as developers are minimum-for-reliability standards. No two people in different locations will have the same pipe. As a developer, I consider it my domain to write software on top of, or using, the socket layer to determine the potential through-put of the given socket, and to test such as needed through-out the simulcast. I don't even want the socket-layer-wrapper writers (may God shower them with blessings) intervening at this level, until everybody on Earth has unrestricted 10mbps/s up and down.

If that control is hidden from me, or not an option, or is nullified by protocol, then my app or media could break in ways I could not predict or understand, and so I would have to design my app using the socket layer in a lowest-common-reliability kind of way.

These are not the opinions of a WebSocket RFC acquainted developer.

I already got companies trying to pay me to learn Ruby. I say no thanks!

The US Government should buy T-Mobile and turn it into a nationwide information super freeway.

Which Motorolla? Google's, or Motorolla's? [context question]

Yes! This article just raised my market value by giving me new insight into the market.

Bleem is three itself. Because three is more than an integer, or any number.

I doubt there is a better PR mechanism in existence than the blacking out of Wikipedia. Count my support for this measure.

Add their names and faces to the Public Shaming Website!

I like the idea of websites using public key encryption. Would the browsers have to implement it on the client side? Could a plugin handle that?

I just built a browser version of the Redis client using dnode, to test it out. Fun and easy to use, and preferable to AJAX. Probably won't replace socket.io where I use it, but could be the foundation for CMS type apps.

Does it have a mic?