MichaelZuo

I don’t see how that helps?

A lawyer isn’t going to sign on to take liability risk unless they spend quite a lot of time analyzing the AI’s outputs for possible blunders?

So it structurally can’t cost significantly less.

Spec committees arent rigid automatons, they can clearly decide on say USB Type C-123 for practical implementation if they chose to.

Obviously there is some latent risk in choosing a career anywhere, that the demand disappears. There can’t literally be zero risk of structural demand changes.

So? Is there a hard limit on just one “Type” in the formal name?

Why not just USB-C Type 123?

That allows for 999 possible permutations of usb-c cables.

This seems to be circular.

Wouldn’t anyone need some reading “taste” in the first place to decide to read more.

And if they already have it, why would they need to read it?

If it’s all relative there can be no globally valid, or fixed, reference points by definition.

Then why tack on some gibberish? Just for the heck of it?

Frankly, I simply don’t believe in your genuineness enough to care about satisfying any requests.

Edit: Nevermmind, not going to waste time on this.

? You’re not even replying to the relevant comment.

I’m not trying to prove anything…?

I just don’t care that much either way about what others think if it’s adversarial, even if thousands of HN users come to this comment chain to opine about this or that macbook model.

If you mean my claim that some team in Apple already knows about it, there’s literally no way to prove that to passing readers.

Why would Cloudflare want to lose credibility and reputation though? Doesnt seem to make sense.

Uh are you confused?

I’m not the one claiming they refuse to test it, they are the ones who said so.

How did that compare to the big firms? HPE, Dell, and so on.

If you dont ever intend to do any testing… then why would anyone care about what you believe or not?

Why post random noise opining?

If you dont believe me… nobody is stopping you from testing various things on the same model?

And if you dont have it already… then what could I possibly say that would motivate you to buy a used one to do the testing to confirm?

Edit: And even on my ipad pro m2 doing literally nothing other than swiping to the app library often causes a visible stutter and lag for hundreds of miliseconds… so if you really think it’s flat out impossible to find consistently slower things on the much more complex macos… idk what to say.

My base 2019 macbook pro 15 on Mojave is actually faster than new macbook pros today on some tasks.

There’s no way Apple doesn’t know about that internally. So I don’t see any other explanation… other than a lack of care, or a bozo explosion.

Many people seemingly have trouble grasping that baselines can shift.

And then they get into mental contortions as to why getting 2x or 3x better in an absolute sense doesn’t budge the needle much.

This is such a bizarre decision that I’m curious who in the org chart made the call.

Isn’t it very ironic to post this under a pseudonym?

Which by definition contains some signalling that deviates from WYSIWYG.

The real curious thing is serious C/C++ folks seem like one of the least likely groups imaginable, to want to undergo humiliating and embarrassing blunders…

Yet they seemingly don’t mind that it practically guarantees them to make blunders over and over again.

Is this AI written?

I didn’t accuse you of downvoting. It’s literally not possible for HN users to downvote the comment they reply to.

Anyone with seemingly over 10k karma would know that.

Hmmm, so it sounds like the root cause isn’t really about “speed” at all… but something else?

For example, someone in a meeting saying things lacking credibility and everyone else just goes along with it anyways. Then it snowballs meeting after meeting.

Even after re-reading this comment, it still reads like gibberish. As if my example was half read, or not at all.

By definition, a billing department of a utility has to be able to “marginalize”… in order to function.

There’s literally no other way I can see for it to work.

Since my old reply was flagged, this now seems like coordinated trolling.

I really doubt you are genuinely incapable of understanding what “regulated electricity utilities” or “expected to provide service” means.

Huh that is an interesting metaphor. A next higher layer printing press?

This doesn’t make sense?

How does “freedom” relate to an electrical utility deciding whether to cut service?

Isn’t that… life?

Even literal regulated electricity utilities aren’t expected to provide service to every last marginal customer.

For example, a poor old grandma missing many electricity bill payments usually will see leniency if she is polite, the utility eventually won’t try to collect cash anymore and instead put a lien on the home while continuing to provide service.

But if the billing department receives multiple threats from her, then they may just cut the service.

“Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.” - John Maynard Keynes

There are a lot of fake people who claim they highly prioritize data security but in fact do not…

Huh? Wouldn’t their prestige be improved if some other group spent a lot of effort improving on it?

That would clearly demonstrate it had real substance beyond hot air or puffery.