1,890 karma · joined September 25, 2008
I agree with a lot of what you say here but not this. People choose what to make easy and what to make more difficult with technology all the time. This does not make something neutral. Obviously something as simple as a hammer is more neutral but this doesn't extend to software systems.
I'm generally not a competitive person so this is so strange to me. Even as an introvert on the spectrum, this sounds terrible. It's a game, it's supposed to be fun. I'd rather do my best to study ahead of time, have fun, and see where it takes me during the competition.
If they get away with it for a few offices and a little money, it just becomes how they do business and grows.
Later I learned it's called masking and a lot of people like yourself think of it as bad.
But it made my life immeasurably better.
I hated how I acted and how people reacted to me when I was young.
I wouldn't even know how to turn off the "masking behavior" now and I never would have become who I am without it.
Maybe it's because I was young and didn't know any other people like me but I don't think labelling this survival technique as hell is right for everybody.
If you haven't seen it and think it's weird to beat a city game; if you fill the entire board with Arcologies, they all become rockets and take off into space. What a thrilling science-fictional way to end the experience. Loved it.
I do agree that there has been a significant shift in developer culture because of business bros and hustle culture, but it's not nearly gone.
But The Business is the bubble part. Like all the companies during the first internet boom/bubble who did stuff like lay tons of fiber and raise tons of money for rickety business plans. Those companies went out of business but the fiber was still there and still useful. So I think you're right in that the Tech part is being shafted a little in the conversation because the Business part is so bubbly.
> For each container Mr Gibson holds up and searches, the police must pay the port a fee of £200.
Of course this is assuming they actually want these agencies to be more efficient and not just die, which is a big assumption.
I think animal companions are a different class than chatbots since they're not trying to be people so I make no comment on those.
Probably true in that it's on track to be mostly destroyed by climate change and people are injuring themselves looking the other way.