LaSombra

Will anyone notice a difference?

There's also the fact that road signage alerts of train tracks well in advance to increase our awareness level to the road ahead.

This is quite astonishing...

Keyword: "should"

Nailed it.

All this added padding from the last few releases forces me to believe this is in preparation for a port to iPad or AVP.

EDIT: The hardware is there, it's just a matter of getting the right UX in place.

How so? It's all FOSS.

That Gruber quote is hard to digest

I didn't know John pivoted to full time podcasting. This actually explains, IMHO, the shift towards a more forgiving view of Apple's product directions.

I have huge respect for John Siracusa. His articles at Ars Technica, pragmatic opinions on the world of computing always spoke to me, but this article sounds like something written by John Gruber.

Apple indeed innovated in multiple ways and markets, but un-removable batteries wasn’t one.

I found this strange as well and have been wondering if there is a hardware constraint that no one is aware, yet.

What are you talking about? What is the relation between Fedora’s decision and the JBoss acquisition?

Depends what the small letters say. Not all insurances are equal, unfortunately.

Oh yeah. I have a friend that said exactly that. The depreciation according to them is negligible compared to other brands to the point that they consider it as an appreciating asset.

They sold a M3 bought in 2017 and lost about £3000 for a new M3 just to recycle the warranty.

Those benefits that CentOS, Rocky offer, as you said, are without cost because the cost is shouldered by Red Hat. If you're a 1:1 rebuild, you can't introduce your own fixes, so CentOS, Rocky rely on Red Hat to write and produce a fix that will then be rebuilt "free of charge" as you mention.

How is that lock-in from Red Hat's part?

Might be the first step into evaluating this course of action. Who knows?

I think Apple might still be gearing towards adding macOS in the iPad only because the macOS interface has been adding padding, in almost all recent releases, while screens have remained the same size. I don't see any other reason for added padding around controls apart from a touch screen future.

I'm still waiting on their IPO to find out how well this strategy is working for them.

Correct. But don't you have to be an owner of their products to ask for the GPL'ed code?

End users are allowed to redistribute the source they received from Red Hat at their hearts content. What Red Hat is terminating, from my understanding, is the future access to new binaries and sources due to the service contract becoming void.

Your server will keep running, you'll have the sources for all the server's binaries, but no more support.

Auto makers, TV makers, and others use GPL software left and right and they don't, or rarely, offer a easy way to obtain it. How's it different?

You say that and it feels like Red Hat never contributed a single line of code to any FOSS projects or doesn't hire any developers to work on FOSS.

Red Hat offers free subscriptions to developers. How doesn't it help in this case?

When did it happen that macOS became Windows wrt answers like "Format it and see if the issue persists" or "Wipe the installation and try again"?

I remember those as solutions for Windows registry bloat, so much so that reinstalling Windows was something scheduled regularly to avoid issues.

You can run Kubernetes on mainframes as well as Linux, so developing for mainframes has become easier these last 20 or so years.

And I think that's one of the main problems with Apple Maps. Once you leave main metropolitan areas, the features start to dwindle.

Every day, thanks to https://newsblur.com

I wonder if there's cost involved on the decision to not having radar or LIDAR installed on those cars.

Nailed it!

And still throw thousands at it.