4,531 karma · joined September 17, 2012
In terms of advice -- everyone's already said it: don't rewrite now, just fix the important bugs and give it a push.
Good luck!
More details on the O'Reilly investment here: http://blog.peerj.com/post/91251985913/exciting-times-peerj-...
(I'm not involved with PeerJ directly, but I should say that we're working with them on opening up science; I'm one of the founders of Overleaf (https://www.overleaf.com), the collaborative writing and publishing platform that grew out of writeLaTeX. Send me a message if you'd like more info.)
You also learn something new everyday - I'd never come across the term "Fisheye Universe" for AdS space before! :)
Rene Descartes goes up to the counter. “I’ll have a scone,” he says. “Would you like juice with that?” asks the barista. “I think not,” says Descartes, and he ceases to exist.
I'll get my coat...
[1] http://www.quora.com/What-does-the-phrase-Nobody-ever-got-fi...
What are you next plans for it? Be good to have a chat sometime in the new year if you're interested :)
It is amazing the difference a term sheet / money in the bank makes - obvious with hindsight, but difficult to see when you're wrapped up in pitches and negotiations.
Edit: And just to reiterate a point from the article - traction makes you seem formidable like nothing else (until you have a term sheet / money)
However, it's a real shame that the Bristol project is basically another study, led by consultants, which won't actual result in any implementation. The Ultra system at Heathrow has now carried over a million passengers, operating in one of the world's busiest environments, and yet none of the engineering or operational experience will factor into the study (or even be used to - shock horror - actually test something rather than just study it).
It's also not the first time Macmillan have tried something new - their whole Digital Science arm (which includes ReadCube) is focused on innovation and disruptive publishing tech: http://www.digital-science.com/
What I particularly liked about Jure's article was his storytelling -- the TL;DR at the start is a great hook, as is the link with the New York subway signage, and so when he gets to the scientific figure standards (and presents a very thorough commentary) you're interested enough to take in the details.
So although it might be slightly easier to get started with, it doesn't let you do everything you need (as a scientific writer).
It's how our startup came about -- we built something which did what we needed, and it turned out that a whole load of other people had the same problem (unsurprising with hindsight, but the point is we set out to solve a problem, not to "create a startup")
Happy to share more thoughts if you're interested.
If you get anything back that inspires you into thinking it could become a business, great - there's a plan.
If nothing inspires you, and you've had a fair number of responses, probably worth moving onto something else.
I hope his work will continue to inspire engineers and innovators for many years to come.