Edit: just a note to say that I added this update to http://johnhammersley.com/?p=428 as that's where this HN story originally pointed to.
4,529 karma · joined September 17, 2012
Edit: just a note to say that I added this update to http://johnhammersley.com/?p=428 as that's where this HN story originally pointed to.
We've also hired a great team who have expanded on using Overleaf with clients -- for example, we use Overleaf for documentation when onboarding a new institution or publisher. It's really helped, and it's broadened out the type of feedback we receive too.
Thanks for using Overleaf! :)
Re the business model: we don't rely on the user subscriptions for revenue -- we provide services for institutions (e.g. Overleaf Commons: https://www.overleaf.com/universities) and publishers (e.g. templates and direct submission links: https://www.overleaf.com/publishers#!publisherslist), as well as private cloud / local installs for companies: https://www.overleaf.com/enterprises
(and that allows us to provide a solid free plan that works well for most users, especially those just starting out with LaTeX)
But yes, the "how does it make money?" question was always one we found difficult to articulate well -- we certainly didn't do it in the YC interview! :)
We've just announced some exciting news too -- the ShareLaTeX team has recently joined Overleaf! More details on that here if you're interested: https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-i...
As a shameless plug, for anyone wanting to use LaTeX without having to install everything locally, the online compilers Overleaf [1] and ShareLaTeX [2] are pretty handy. I'm one of the founders of Overleaf, and we're excited to now be working together with the ShareLaTeX team [3]. Feedback always appreciated :)
[2] https://www.sharelatex.com/
[3] https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-i...
On your side question: it's a tricky one, as although we do try to keep pace with the different browser updates to keep in the in-browser experience ok on ios, I agree it's not ideal. Long term we do want to do something better, but it's not an immediate priority (given that mobile use of Overleaf for editing is still relatively low, and we find that a lot of tablet users use separate keyboards). Hope that helps clarify, even if I don't have an immediate solution!
If you do use it, feedback is always appreciated (I'm one of the Overleaf founders), thanks.
Good luck with your future projects!
It includes a rich text mode for easier collaboration with non-LaTeX users [2], and you can also write in Markdown if you like :) [3].
Feedback always appreciated if you do give it a try, thanks.
We also published a short post on 'the stoic resilience of the PDF within the digital ecosystem' recently [3], which seems relevant...although it's just a short background piece.
I've written more about this here if you're interested: http://johnhammersley.com/?p=381
I'm one of the founders of Overleaf, so if you have any questions (or if you use it and have any feedback), please let me know -- it's always appreciated, thanks.
(although I like your workaround!)
https://www.overleaf.com/latex/examples/latex-wine-stains/cd...
If the author is reading these comments, what motivated/inspired you to do this?
We're also working with publishers to ease the submissive process to journals and repos[2], and include things like git-sync for offline working[3].
Great to see lots of different approaches to solving these problems though, and Texture is certainly an interesting idea.
"His friends and family paid the first $1,000 dollars, which he spent on a press release. That small publicity gave his site more traffic, which in turn persuaded more advertisers to have faith."
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4585026.stm
I remember from the TV news coverage he talked about how he'd sent that press release out to hundreds of news outlets. So I feel he (in part at least) made his own luck on this one.
So whilst he was lucky, he did kind of make his own luck by putting the money into it -- he could have just taken that money and sat on it.
Yes, me too -- thanks for posting your reply and the link, I've now learnt something new today (and it's only 00:45 so that's a good start to the weekend!).
We continue to see strong use in this area today, and indeed there seems to be a growing trend for interdisciplinary collaborations (I'm one of the founders, and we started it very much as a side project between mathematicians needing to collaborate in LaTeX!).
It's also great to see that some of the newest innovations in publishing platforms are in the (computational) life sciences area too, e.g. F1000Research[3] (which offers open, post-publication peer review) and PeerJ[4] (which has a membership model but no fee to publish).
https://twitter.com/overleaf/status/763395560682364928
and for something more light-hearted, here's a D&D template in LaTeX!
Since we've grown (now at half a million users worldwide), we're now also working to help solve and streamline the submission & publishing process, for many of the same reasons discussed in this article.
Feels like change is finally happening, which as a scientist myself is great to see!