It's a case of, if you haven't tried it, it doesn't work. And who tests their backup?
28,945 karma · joined October 18, 2009
It's a case of, if you haven't tried it, it doesn't work. And who tests their backup?
None of this is new ground.
I admit at first, I thought the title meant, what if I can fix the issue faster than you can explain it to me? Because I wrote the code, and know where the demons hide.
This: https://www.wonders-of-the-world.net/Statue-of-Liberty/Copie...
Or, just let the oceans recover, let the mollusks return to the bays and shores, let them do their efficient thing.
None of us knew the others would be there.
Turns out the issue was more, locals getting used to Midwesterners I guess?
It might be a way to deploy GPS satellites to Mars without a major mission effort?
Some of us may have too little to 'go on' to make a convincing avatar. Others may have biased samples, perhaps from lectures or recordings of performances.
Probably it may require an interview with those than knew them well. There would be memory bias, and the natural tendency to speak kindly of the dead. That might even serve the purpose better - it's a memorial after all, meant to be presentable and maybe not reflect the worst aspects of a personality.
In the 1960's long past the time that party lines and manual operators were supposed to be extinct. But, rural Iowa.
Early versions had a fairly fatal flaw. They responded to bad reception (reception but failure of checksum etc due to interference) by 'downshifting' e.g. reducing their transmission rate from 10Mbit to lower rates.
This seems rational, but in practice it usually shifted all the way to the minimum (1Mbps!) and got no relief. In fact, packets were 10 to 100 times 'longer' in airtime, congesting the channel so nobody got anything through.
Why did they get no relief? Because frequently the noise was bursty e.g. microwave oven pulse or auto spark plug noise. Going slower meant larger (longer to transmit) packets, which provided a 'bigger target' for the noise to poke a hole in.
A more useful response was to try the fastest rate, a smaller packet which got hit with fewer 'darts' impacting any particular packet.