HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

InternetUser

108 karma · joined October 13, 2012

submissionscomments
InternetUser··on More than 9M broken links on Wikipedia are now rescued
There's long been a saying that "Once it's out there (on the Internet), it's forever," but I used to save links in a Microsoft Word document, and I went through them a few years later and almost none of them worked anymore. The years in which they were saved was 2006 to 2009, and the year I went through them was 2012. The links were from MySpace (which totally overhauled the entire site and all content), Facebook (where users had deleted their profiles or pictures), Tumblr (where bloggers rename their blogs, which change the URL, or they wipe them clean, or delete their blogs), YouTube (tons of videos and whole accounts have been deleted because of copyright infringement, whether by the account holder or by YouTube itself), Blogspot (same, but also that some bloggers made their blogs private, perhaps to prevent spam-comments or trolling), Yahoo articles (which I see Yahoo deletes after some time), Style.com (Vogue magazine's website of all runway shows, which are now on Vogue.com instead, with a different URL structre), and dozens of other websites that don't exist anymore.

I think the statement about "stuff that's out there" really only applies to famous or public people, where leaked and/or damning photos or videos are quickly copied, saved, and rehosted by websites all over the world, including Twitter, Pinterest, and other platforms. For instead, while Google Images fastidiously won't show you the hacked photos of "Jennifer Lawrence naked," as Google sought to avoid a $100M lawsuit [0], Bing Images, once you turn off Safe Search, shows plenty of sites that host the pictures, with most frequent such site being a German-based one called "OhFree," but there are at least 3 Blogspot sites as well, I suppose ironically.

[0] > "We've removed tens of thousands of pictures," says the web giant - https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/google-responds-je...

InternetUser··on Wall Street Erases the Line Between Its Jocks and Nerds
Backup copy: http://archive.is/wKjbx
InternetUser··on Twitter shares drop after reporting declining monthly active users
Take my own changing habits, for example: over a span of 15 years, I "migrated" from MySpace to Tumblr to Reddit and a few news websites. I have only ever used Facebook except to promote a website. I think tens of millions of people, mostly young guys, prefer playing videos games over any form of social networking or even writing comments in response to ANY type of content.
InternetUser··on PeerTube, the “Decentralized YouTube”, succeeds in crowdfunding
YouTube, launched in early 2005, actually instated the 10-minute limit in 2007 or 2008; I remember watching plenty of full TV shows in the first couple of years, and I remember that one of the most popular and constantly recommended were episodes of "Chappelle's Show" (noted in the Viacom lawsuit that could have destroyed YouTube, had Google not owned it by them) and there were also uploads of the Comedy Central version of "Who's Line Is It Anyway?" and 1980s and '90s SNL episodes. Then there was the 10-minute limit, then 15 [0]--and there were tons of broadcast-TV uploads that were divided up in such segments (such as the very popular "MoxNewsDotCom" channel's uploads of the 2008 U.S. election debates)--and then by the end of 2010, YouTube started allowing videos of any length, and I recall seeing novelty videos of some repeating loops for several or dozens of hours [1][2].

[0] Undated, but still showing up: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/71673?hl=en&co=GEN...

[1] "THE LONGEST VIDEO ON YOUTUBE - 596.5 HOURS" - Dec 14, 2011 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04cF1m6Jxu8

https://www.youtube.com/results?sp=EgIYAkIECAESAA%253D%253D&...

InternetUser··on PeerTube, the “Decentralized YouTube”, succeeds in crowdfunding
> [YouTube is] incentivised to make what they're looking for as difficult to find as possible so that they'll spend hours and hours binging vacuous addictive content looking for something but never quite finding it and getting no satisfaction from the experience.

What you just gave is an imaginary description from someone who evidently doesn't use YouTube. I remember seeing Google presentations (on its official YouTube channel) in 2007 and 2008 where executives were saying that the goal of Google Search is to get you to what you're looking for as quickly as possible, and that's one reason that Google Search became the leader in search, and its very name is a verb for looking up something online. YouTube does the same exact thing, and the way they hook you into watching more are the automatic "related video" and "subscribe" overlays in the video player itself, and then the long column of related videos and, for any professional video, a pre-made playlist that is based on the viewing selections of other viewers, in the left column (on desktop browsers) or under the video (on phones). If I'm looking up a video by a singer, I find a long list of results. If I'm looking up funny bulldog videos, I find the same. If I'm looking up burger-cooking tutorials, I find the same. If I'm looking up clips from a certain TV show, I find the same. You're saying that YouTube doesn't do that? Try looking up some things on it and see for yourself: https://www.youtube.com/

InternetUser··on The US Mint lost $69M making pennies last year
Why don't you just do what I do: when you buy something in-person with cash and there's change, count the paper money and then just hastily count out the change, knowingly giving more then the exact cent amount, and say "Keep the change, and no need for the receipt." Precious seconds can be saved every time. Also, if I'm in line behind someone who is taking too long with anything up to 2 dollars, I just say "I'll pay it" or I even quickly hand the cashier the money.
InternetUser··on The US Mint lost $69M making pennies last year
> tons of weight and bulk

What is your height and weight?

InternetUser··on The US Mint lost $69M making pennies last year
> At one point in my life, a long time ago, things could be purchased for a penny.

What were 3 or 4 such things?

InternetUser··on Facebook Use Has Been Dropping Since the 2016 Election, According to SimilarWeb
> /r/Politics will be full of "ShareBlue" links and /r/The_Donald will be full of Breitbart.

I know it feels good to just breezily generalize, but I just looked through the 2 subreddits you named, and of the 125 top-voted links of the past 24 hours on /t/The_Donald, a whopping 4 of them are from Breitbart (a simply Ctrl+F on each page shows it). That subreddit is most memes, tweets, and even simple photos with smart-ass original titles written by the poster. Just do a word-find on "i.redd.it" and then "imgur.com" on each of the first few pages and see.

As for Shareblue on /r/Politics, there are no links from the Shareblue.com domain in the top 125 links today, but I assume you were referring to the source of the narratives; well, you would more effective in just point to actual sites: of the top 125 links on there for the past 24 hours, 16 are from WashingtonPost.com and 15 are from TheHill.com.

Edit - here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/

https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/

InternetUser··on Cow Game Extracted Facebook Data
How many people, let's say specifically 18-29-year-old in America, keep up on national and/or world news every day? Consider that just about 100M of 236M eligible voters did NOT bother to vote [0][1]; that is 42% of the eligible electorate who either didn't care at all, or figured that Trump and Hillary were the same, or that it didn't matter to their own lives, or that elections are a sham, or that their own district or state would go a certain way no matter what. But from my own experience, the first of those reasons is the most common; anyone I know who doesn't care about political news (even while they may avidly follow sports news or entertainment news or human-interest news about the latest viral YouTube video) responds to me bringing up politics, whether face-to-face or online, with a comment like "Who cares."

[0] Washington Post: About 100 million people couldn’t be bothered to vote this year

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/12/about...

[1] A reported 137,100,229 people voted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_ele...

InternetUser··on Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA
If you mean Reddit's Personals, a major difference is that the posts don't use pictures--and it's not like the posters use their first and last name as their username or anywhere in their post--so hopefully that'll keep it safe. After all, the main personals section has "148,372 readers" and right now, as of 11:57 PM Eastern Time, "1,946" are logged in. https://www.reddit.com/r/r4r/
InternetUser··on Users Abandon Facebook After Cambridge Analytica Findings
I suppose it all depends on how much user attrition you would say constitutes a "mass exodus." How many millions of former users would that be? Or what percentage from what high-point? By these following reports, there's been a mass exodus in terms of usage among the much-sought-after teenage demographic, and that's been happening from Facebook to Snapchat for at least two years now:

Oct 2016: Snapchat Beats Instagram and Facebook as the Top Social Platform for Teens

http://www.adweek.com/digital/snapchat-beats-instagram-and-f...

May 2017: AppAnnie report: "On any given day in the US, 35% of Snapchat’s daily users cannot be reached by Facebook, 46% can't be reached by Instagram and 58% can’t be reached by Messenger" the report says.

https://mashable.com/2017/05/03/snapchat-users-facebook/#2Pm...

Oct 2017: Snapchat Furthers Its Lead As Teens’ Favorite Social Platform, BUT [Instagram is Reportedly "a Better Bet" for Marketers]

https://www.marketingcharts.com/digital/social-media-80744

InternetUser··on The Facebook Brand
Excellent post.
InternetUser··on Depixelizing Pixel Art (2011)
For the like pixel art, click here and scroll way down: http://noirlac.tumblr.com/archive
InternetUser··on Facebook's Desperate Smoke Screen
This was the major revelation that hundreds of millions of people made when the Snowden stuff was released years ago. Not to imply that the "FAANGs" are pure-minded and fair entities, but you are already required to be identified, documented, tracked, and known, year to year, by many large powerful entities: the company you work for, your bank, the IRS, the Social Security Administration, MasterCard or Visa (I would assume you have at least one credit card), your phone company, the DMV, the judicial system (whether you were the culprit or victim of a crime), and so on. As for what you can do to avoid being known to Facebook, Google, and so on, well, you could move to another country, but then you'd just end up tracked by their services (e.g. VK.com is the #1 site in Russia,[0] and Baidu and WeChat are respectively the #1 search and social network in China, with 980 million MAUs[1][2], and they are now requiring gov't IDs[3]).

[0] https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/RU

[1] https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/CN

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WeChat

[3] https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/1/16721230/wechat-china-app-...

But an answer to your specific question, as far as specifically avoiding Facebook, Google, and Amazon, is to only visit websites that don't have any link to those sites (e.g. no Facebook link, no Google Analytics script and make sure no one you know uses Google Voice, and not built on AWS), and don't use email anymore, just text messaging and phone calls.

InternetUser··on Facebook's Desperate Smoke Screen
Excellent, excellent points. What country are you from, if I may ask?

Also, I'd rewrite your opening rhetorical question for clarity:

Was TV, as a homogenizing force that entertained and dumbed people down to what big-money publishers wanted them to believe, a better alternative?

InternetUser··on Facebook's Desperate Smoke Screen
It's not about the content matter itself, it's about the activity: staring silently and passively at a screen for many hours every day, and the fundamental difference that Facebook makes people feel they are carrying on relationships, when actually the online relationship takes over the real-life relationship. You were watching your friends and relatives (their personal lives or otherwise) on TV.
InternetUser··on Facebook's Desperate Smoke Screen
What are 2 or 3 of the "4channish/the_donaldish" media outlets you are referring to, other than 4chan and The_Donald?
InternetUser··on How to tame the tech titans
> Web searches are a pretty low-frequency, low-importance action for me.

Web searches are a very high-frequency, high-importance action for me--I do dozens of searches every day--and Google Search, whether for text, images, videos, or physical addresses, is so much more superior to any other search engine in thoroughness and organization, that there is, quite simply, no question about it.

InternetUser··on Facebook to Let Users Rank Credibility of News
> news that nearly noone disagrees with

Well, in a country where 30 states voted for Trump, 20 states voted for Hillary, and 100 million people chose not to vote (and that's 42% of the eligible electorate[0]), who shall be arbiter of what news, at least U.S. political news, "nearly noone disagrees with"? I mean, given that a majority of politically active people in a large majority of states voted for Trump, I expect that you'll agree with me that Alex Jones' endlessly pro-Trump daily videos should be featured right at the top of everyone's News Feed. I know I'd love that.

[0] http://archive.is/NDUkb

https://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel/videos

InternetUser··on Facebook to Let Users Rank Credibility of News
Here's my theory, and I think it's quite obvious: Zuckerberg, as someone with a reported $74B in net worth[0], is actually a Republican, and strongly supports Trump and is pushing for his reelection. All the apologizes and damage control is just virtue-signalling to appease the entertainment industry (by which I include the news industry), which relies on and trusts Facebook for their very existence.

[0] https://www.forbes.com/profile/mark-zuckerberg/

InternetUser··on Facebook to Let Users Rank Credibility of News
Here are the "peers" that I have reviewing what I hear from politicians: the salary on my paycheck, the tax figures on that paycheck, and the prices at the gas station and supermarket. I don't need to pore over news editorials and blogs posts or watch commentators on any TV channel to know which political figure is making more sense and describing reality more accurately.
InternetUser··on Facebook to Let Users Rank Credibility of News
> education won't fix echo chambers.

No fewer than 6 of the coveted "swing states" switched from blue to red[0], and many counties across the country flipped as well. What persuaded hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of 2012 Obama voters to be 2016 Trump voters? Trump himself educated them, in his speeches. I'm one such person, spent the entire election season commenting and chatting with others on Reddit and YouTube with others, and there were countless Trump supporters who had been Obama supporters. Trump educated us more about the political system than any politician or journalist ever has. He taught people the phrase "lobbyists, donors, and special interests." That itself had a very powerful effect.

[0] https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president

InternetUser··on The Struggling Artist at 86
That first video is awesome, thank you! As for the second type of postmodern-art-hater you quote, do you ever think that someone can be making a valid point about the valuelessness and meaninglessness of someone's creations that have been chosen by another person to be displayed in a gallery? Is everyone who draws or paints a picture an artist? I myself see much of postmodern art as "meta-art," or a work of "art commentary," a statement about what people can be made to see as "art" (such as: excrement on a floor, a pile of rocks, or a piece of paper that says "This is art") but it's not art. I'd say that Duchamp's urinal is meta-art.
InternetUser··on The Struggling Artist at 86
Would you have said the same if his comment was "It's a wonder he's still struggling, his art is very good."
InternetUser··on The Struggling Artist at 86
> For example, how many people did this guy influence

The fantastic site WikiArt includes influences, as seen here:

https://www.wikiart.org/en/gustav-klimt

InternetUser··on The Struggling Artist at 86
"cake," you say? https://www.google.com/search?q=Van+Gogh+cake&rlz=1C1CHMO_en...
InternetUser··on The Struggling Artist at 86
As a corollary, is there no such thing as 'art'? Are you someone who would you say "anything can be art"?
InternetUser··on Corporate B.S. Generator
The 3 best I got:

dynamically cloudify long-term high-impact architectures

distinctively grow hyper-scale convergence

enthusiastically leverage other's resource-sucking partnerships

fungibly repurpose resource-sucking technology

InternetUser··on German hate speech law tested as Twitter blocks satire account
Is that a movie quote or something?
← PreviousPage 2 of 4Next →