The irony is that the system might technically be "correct" about where the car was seen overnight, but that still doesn't prove anything about where the family actually lives
What's concerning is not just the surveillance aspect but the idea that this kind of data is treated as authoritative enough to override traditional documentation like mortgage statements and utility bills
I don't think the goal is "fewer stops" in isolation, it's more about finding the spacing where the system functions more like transit and less like a hail-anywhere shuttle
There's also a feedback loop here: if stops are too close, buses are slow and unreliable, which reduces ridership, which makes it harder to justify investing in either the stops or the surrounding pedestrian environment
It seems like stop balancing is best understood less as a silver bullet and more as one of the prerequisites for making buses fast and frequent enough to actually compete with driving
It could absolutely be a breeding ground for worms but it could also become the first place we learn how agent-to-agent security actually breaks in the wild
I think the real question isn't whether they think like humans, but whether their "discussions" lead to consistent improvement in how they accomplish tasks
It's more a stress test showing that even with unusually high consumption, solar + batteries + tariff optimisation can still materially change the cost curve
This setup only really works because of a very specific combination of smart tariffs, EVs, and aggressive automation. Without those, the math would look very different
Building a dedicated AI-focused consumer line is risky: long development cycles, uncertain demand, and the chance that today's hype cools before the product ships
Something built to shave off latency on a handheld gaming device ends up scaling to hyperscale servers, not because anyone planned it that way, but because the abstraction was done right
What really stuck with me is how delayed the correction was. You didn't get immediate feedback that "this is not how people actually relate to each other" until college, and by then the social debt was already there. That's a brutal way to learn norms
The tragedy is that we responded to the real dangers of the past by trying to eliminate all risk, and in doing so stripped away most of the texture that made childhood feel real