976 karma · joined August 29, 2018
not for profit
https://nvsbl.org
i'm not saying it's not like these big tech firms don't have their hands legally tied by NSA letters, but that's entirely divorced from whether i trust them to steward my data.
slur me if you like.
cogent gonna cogent. i think you're still probably good for the most part.
if you have, i won't take ethically-compromised advice from you.
otherwise... can't check from work, but perhaps anna's archive/slsk has you covered?
the part near the end discussing the loser's realization and process of transitioning into sociopath (or ending up "worse" than before) reminded me of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. it's been over a decade since i read it but i think the underlying idea is fairly similar to that process.
i only got to experience this place once or twice as a kid. i would LOVE to be able to go back as an adult with spending money. RIP!
the approach is still pretty different in macOS compared to most other WM behaviors, namely: cmd-tilde cycles windows within the currently-open application, and cmd-tab cylces through applications. in most other environments, alt-tab will cycle windows across all open applications (and win-tab does something like cmd-tab on macOS but somehow horribly).
funny to bring this one up as an example among the others (but i suppose it's evidence that things can go the other way).
i was waiting to buy a new M5 MBP this year until they got so cozy with the current administration. now i'm just making do with my current machine until i can get a decent price on a used M5 machine in a couple of years. i'm in the process of cancelling all of my recurring apple subscriptions as well.
i'll probably use macs for as long as i use computers, but i think i'm done giving apple any money directly.
i don't really trust the BBC too much either. i'm just curious if there's a specific pattern of coverage or if this is a general feeling.
what an oddly specific example
as long as the boxes are checked, most public sector employees are not going to stick their neck out. it's steady work that pays all right and has great benefits (and even pensions sometimes). a lot of people in the public sector aren't willing to step out of line for "frogs" even when they should or want to.
disclaimer: OSTENSIBLY
if the sole aim was to reduce AI provider culpability, then a disclaimer would meet that requirement.
humans famously suck at acting within rational self-interest; therefore, this isn't trying to protect AI providers of legal responsibility. it's trying to mitigate unwanted results from actions taken based on decisions informed by unverified LLM output.
"I gotta tell you, I am loving this Yada Yada thing. You know, I can gloss over my whole life story."