"most" might not, I can't claim anything there and EFF claims most don't, when they were checking on it in 2015-2017. I'm pretty darn sure that some do though.
21,066 karma · joined December 16, 2009
Contact me: hn@username.is . The "hn" helps me organize; it's unnecessary, but appreciated.
I'm also currently @groxx@hachyderm.io
"most" might not, I can't claim anything there and EFF claims most don't, when they were checking on it in 2015-2017. I'm pretty darn sure that some do though.
I 100% agree - almost everything about them screams "this is The Ideal Corporate Solution".
This isn't a bad thing, it's nice to have a standard for corporate uses. And the attestation-DRM stuff makes perfect sense there, you already have MDM and it fits with that perfectly....... though not all that differently than using MDM to set up client-side certificates. But app/OS support is better, for some reason. Why didn't they just improve that flow?
For personal use though, they seem outright hostile to people living in the real world with common failure modes. It's outrageously clear that normal people were a distant afterthought - just look at how hostile it was to syncing at the beginning, and how long it took to get key exporting (and how directly hostile they were to anyone building a stopgap in the meantime).
Passkeys only very recently got relatively broad support for migrating data (after years of promise and no support at all), and they report (optionally with hardware attestation) what password manager you're using so sites can force specific ones.
If you set up a swipe to launch another launcher, you can have all your widgets there, as sometimes that's nice for a multi-app overview of Stuff™ at a glance.
so you're best off writing a small one that you do your best to hide, and make a few fancy ones per season with graphs and absurd will-never-be-implemented details for the higher-ups to be distracted by.
I broadly expect third-party RCS apps to drop that though, like how essentially none support all of MMS. did you know MMS supports slideshows (I built support for this once)? 3d objects (mimetype model/gltf+json)? "timed text" (mimetype text/mp4)?
I am very glad to hear they're finally exposing some of those details though. Now they just need to open it up to third parties, like the original reference implementation did over a decade ago, so we don't need to blindly trust them as much.
One of the houses I rented many years ago didn't even have metered gas. We paid a "hookup" fee to the city (like... $40/quarter?), and they didn't care how much we used, as long as it wasn't for commercial purposes. I assume the city had something for detecting extreme use or leaks, but that's probably it. It was a somewhat strange property though.
Having two options during cold winters can pay for itself with one emergency repair though, or be a massive savings if it can't be fixed fast enough and pipes burst.
But once it landed in Zuck's hands, I no longer trust it one bit. Abandon ship.
I'm not sure which of the two is better tbh. Utterly dominated by a Facebook-owned system, or using something that's crappy enough that people spread out to a variety of systems?
But honestly, in a non-open ecosystem, can you really trust that the near-exclusive two major players are actually playing by the rules? Apple has been relatively protective of its users on privacy stuff, but I've lost all trust in Google at this point.
Thank you for the details! That lays it out nicely for anyone else passing through.
Featured prominently in the "Source Code" container on https://keyboard.futo.tech/
AFAIK everything FUTO makes is open source? I haven't seen a counter-example (I have not looked hard though!), and https://futo.tech/about claims the following:
>All FUTO-funded projects are expected to be open source or develop a plan to eventually become so. No effort will ever be taken to hide from the people what their computers are doing, to limit how they use them, or to modify their behavior through their software.
If they don't desire it, it's spam for them. And they rather clearly do not desire it.
(You could also go with the stronger "unrequested marketing" definition, which makes this even more "definitely spam". CAN-SPAM rules define it this way, so that seems fair too)
Don't forget increased-contrast too!
I much prefer zero stress - if money is tight, we just don't do expensive stuff, or steal the bill before they have a chance to pay. Mostly that means we stay cheap until we can safely cover multiple people if needed (running your safety-buffer low enough that you can't do that is a terrible idea anyway).
1: you can't get access to actions or details in the history (e.g. no long-press to change settings), nor does it show you ones you didn't dismiss by hand afaict (I've been having Discord notifications disappearing almost immediately after making a noise, but there's nothing in history even though I saw it for its whole half-second existence because it popped over my screen).