2,620 karma · joined February 11, 2019
ian at docstring dot dev
That’s one of the bigger ones. Unfortunately recent events means scraping is still a gray area.
(Only EFF is really for this particular issue though)
Really the thing is there's not way to ascribe correctness to a piece of code right, like humans fail at this even. The only "correct" code is like rote algorithmic code that has a well defined method of operation. And there's likely a lot more correct examples of that, like way more than you'd ever be able to poison.
You may be able to be misleading though by using names that say one thing but do another, but again you'd be fighting against the tide of correctly named things.
They really do though, some RASPUTIN level AI just naming things.
Obviously in your case some trivial SQL would have sufficed, which I feel like should have been caught in an interview but could be excused for a junior eng.
Also Pandas is not an amazing choice for data engineering tasks in general IMO, type conversion wonkiness is one reason I have questions about people who decide to use Pandas for legitimate data engineering tasks (as opposed to exploratory work or analysis).
I could retire at something like 1.8m to be honest. My current style of living costs about 50k a year. Throw that into index funds live off a 4% withdrawal and I'm out and I move to a LCOL. That's 72k a year which is 20k some odd higher than median earning in the US. In most non metro areas that'd be a fantastic existence in which I no longer have to care about 99% of the mundane crap I do now.
I love working so I'd continue to do things but solely at my discretion so there'd still be some months where I bring in more external cash probably on contract.
If things go well, then if this whole industry goes south I'll be insulated.
Also not joking though blunt it may be, don't be in a European country where wages don't even approach our lowest end dev in the US.
BUT
I don't see the industry going south -- I see it being bifurcated where lower end devs who glue APIs together see their wages driven wayyyyyy down. Find a difficult niche that pays well and try to keep skills towards the top like 60th percentile and higher and your life won't change.
I guess one of the downsides of forming my own belief system versus religion is it's bedrock is just a wee bit younger and potentially less well formed as I've been learning. Back to the drawing board :P
The article says the study suggests there's not a really strong causal relationship in either way which surprises me a little but yeah I can see it given the experience.
And If I were to find religion suddenly again now I imagine it may only increase life satisfaction based on the fact I have no real community at the moment and that I think is probably a more interesting study.
How much has external community (i.e. not close friends, partners and families) breakdown occurred over the last 40 years and what is the effect on our life satisfaction? My grandfather was a part of a bunch of men's clubs etc last I checked most of those are floundering now.
----
Right which is why I qualified it with "If you have a small set of useable features". Honestly, feeling shamed is your hang up, same with feeling demeaned. I've had that said to me and it motivated me and was helpful, because I had been holding back.
I guess we'll agree to disagree because I don't know you and I don't want to like armchair psychology here. But, I'm certainly not going to tiptoe around every word though just because someone somewhere may be offended, especially in this case where I believe most people would find it helpful.
We were doing millions of inferences and we had a specific target of a couple thousand a second so a specific case for sure but that's my two cents.
If I dropped their app distribution onto Windows it would also succeed there with the general mainstream public, in fact even more so, because of the garbage state for app management there.
I read "Thinking: Fast and Slow" something like 7 years ago now and while I wouldn't be able to give you a direct account of the ideas I've taken away from it at this point, I wonder how much partially or completely incorrect ideas on thinking I internalized from it.
Obviously I can now adjust my mental model but pop sci still feels a bit like a mine field for the quality of thought I may be taking away from it. I just started "The Selfish Gene" and this post has me wary of the quality of it even though just like Fast And Slow it's fairly critically acclaimed.
I think if anything in the last few years I've found myself being highly skeptical of most claims and ideas (which is also a balancing act, but largely good) which wasn't necessarily the case when I was reading Fast and Slow instead committing a common sin and taking the fact the author was a well regarded practitioner in their field at face value.
I guess the point of my comment here is I find that without taking (or really having the) the time to follow every idea to it's foundations and given there are an incredible number of ideas being thrown around openly and with little barrier to entry having to rely on some type of illogical filter and tendency towards your own biases is required just to filter down to a smaller set of ideas that at least seem plausible. The issue with that as we see on a day to day basis is that most people's filter (including my own given the critique of this book) sucks and we wind up with a bunch of plausible but incorrect ideas being treated as fact and propagated throughout the world. It would be nice if finding some kind of objective truth didn't require turning seeking that truth into a life mission.
It's also something to be said that most people operate on these faulty models throughout life to great success by conventional standards so it's not like knowing some set of objective truths, if they're there in the first place (I'm not entirely convinced everything has an objective truth), is a pre-requisite to a happy, successful or fulfilling life -- they may even be the opposite. I just have always found that unpalatable and hope we find ways to think better.
http://www.cpreview.org/blog/2021/6/why-are-we-failing-our-s...
To your point about transparency and trust for general transactions, I can see how that will be useful but don't you lose the ability that most trusted entities have now which is to roll back the transaction or correct a situation if fraud has occurred, given what I understand to be the finality of a contract? That said, I'm personally not really worried about making a transaction over say VISA's network but I am concerned about the end party I'm interacting with and I feel like crypto in general doesn't do well to address that, which I almost feel like is the real issue. I don't think I understand why people feel like it's an issue if they have to transact over a bigger central authority, perhaps I'm just too far removed from the group of people not served by classical finance.
So assuming that this is mainly an issue of people not understanding versus understanding and not caring (though you said there’s some of that) how is the Ethereum community going to get the word out so that this becomes a mainstream success versus mainly for speculation as it is now?
A common issue and one that I personally feel crypto in general suffers from is that neat tech isnt a a criteria on which most people flock to use something so what are the reasons end users need to know to be like ah yup I will drop my regular finance interactions for this or heavily augment them with this?