I shared this because I think the pictured wheelchairs are an example of how there are likely many low hanging fruit when it comes to technology to materially improve the lives of the elderly.
655 karma · joined February 6, 2014
> Incidentally, you do not need to be running a web server to use the .pac file. You can access it via a file:// type URL. For example (note the 3 slashes): file:///Users/username/Library/proxy.pac
http://hints.macworld.com/article.php?story=2004010109555326...
I think if you replace _____ with the right word almost every result I've seen in my (albeit somewhat limited) exposure to category theory can be described this way.
(not that that detracts from your answer!)
Specifically: I'm disputing the theological claim "Being a practicing L, G, B, or T or pro any of them is against sharia, the Catechism, and against the rules of many major Protestant sects like Mormons." That's not really a settled question.
Part of this message would be good for programmers to hear too
Does anyone know if this graphical reasoning system something Lewis Carroll invented himself?
It looks like he also wrote a sequel book, about how to turn the system into a game: https://archive.org/details/gameoflogic00carruoft/page/28/mo...
Unfortunately it hasn't been digitised as well as OP
"The first rule of style is to have something to say. The second rule of style is to control yourself when, by chance, you have two things to say; say first one, then the other, not both at the same time."
It's a quote by George Polya.
The paragraphs you have written don't seem unprofessional to me.
The best way to improve the "flow" of ideas when you write is to have a clear idea of where one idea ends and the other starts.
For longer pieces of writing, consider intentionally "signposting", by saying meta things like "now that I have explained X, I can set out why Y is so interesting".
The one source I could find was https://www.globalenergyinstitute.org/energy-security-risk-i... which placed the UK in the top 3 countries for energy security (many years running).
Do let me know if you have some data that would change my mind! (and ditto for food security)
I really like this balanced sentiment at the end of the article. It's easier to feel different or weird or out of touch when you affirm for yourself that you're being weird by your own choice - to the extent that you _want_ to be different to everyone else.
It's a nice mean between the two extremes of going full conformist or going full hipster.
^ This is a link to a relevant article containing an important counterpoint: it argues based on a few assumptions that we should let computers write our moral codes and not the other way around.
The linked article is very different right? Because it's using a neural net to do some kind of probabilistic inference as a heuristic for imperfectly stimulating physical events.