1,752 karma · joined July 26, 2010
One of Univac's problems was the proliferation of operating systems for the different incompatible architectures. There was Exec 8 for the premier 1100 series (36-bit); OS/4, OS/3, OS/7 and later VS/9 (formerly RCA's TSOS then VMOS) for the 9000 series (32-bit); also the 418 and 494 real-time OS'es (18-bit words). Then there was the CADE 1900. All written in Assembler of course. We even had Varian in the branch, with salesmen from the different product lines competing for business.
All this duplication resulted in overhead and squandering of programmer resources.
After the Burroughs merger, the joke was that UNISYS stood for "Univac is Still Your Supplier".
I was three days in my jeans at business meetings. My bag came back through Lima, Peru and Houston. My bag was having more fun than me.
I don't want subscriptions to specific newspapers. There are not enough hours in the month to take advantage of all of them.
The Tsar and the aristocracy failed at their job. They deserved their fate, to be fired. Maybe Communism was the only way to drag Russian society, kicking and screaming, into the modern era that other European nations had attained, centuries earlier.
Unfortunately, Communism does not have the checks and balances of Capitalism, and it lends itself to abuse by tyrants and dictators.
I work isolated. I didn’t learn about STL until years later,
Windows took a gamble years ago when the winner was not obvious, we’re stuck with UCS-2, but you can circumvent that with a good string library like QT’s Qstring.
I have never experienced the need for a ‘goto’ otherwise.
Now, 1970’s COBOL, that was another story.
It's worth it for commercial customers. It's a fair business model for an Open Source project.