938 karma · joined August 6, 2011
Now if you increase your friends to 100, 200, 500, or more than this perception is even worse!! You'll be seeing multiple friends travelling each week. And on the holidays it will be even worse. However individually each friend is about the same on average.
To make things even more skewed you will probably have a few friends that will indeed have a better highlight reel, and possibly a better life, so of course you'll compare yourself to them more than your average friends cause that's how humans work. And God forbid one is a prolific facebook poster!
Also another thing to remember is that the more a post is liked the more feeds it showed up in. In other words really cool news will appear in a lot more feeds and negative news dies fast. This further skews our perceptions of how great things are.
The key is that comparing in facebook is a bad thing. The data is all skewed and not really comparable, but we still do it because it's in our nature. The best advice is to try and appreciate and remember this and as a result avoid those kinds of comparisons. Well that and like everything else such as TV, etc., limit your time to something reasonable. Oh and if you have friends that are really just acquaintances that fall into these categories then don't be afraid to hide their feeds ;)
The main issue is how do news websites make money? Other than spamming us with ads, which itself has low ROI, no news website has been able to figure a good solution. And if you point to sites like NY Times, ask yourself first if they are really succeeding if they also didn't spam us with ads too...
I think Ubisoft is doing a very good thing. It's better than most companies. If they want to maximize their retainment investment they just need to have some direction for the people on the bench. The problem is, is it worth this additional investment? Probably not. On a positive note your self motivators can take advantage of it which is great. And those that don't, well they don't.
I've just read many comments that show getting traffic is not an issue. Yes it might be more competitive but lots have gotten traffic. The common issue I see is that none of them have been able to generate enough revenues to support themselves, even with good traffic.
Ps: yes I expect to see this doe voted too :(
Also the odds of it leaving Africa and coming to the us were virtually non-existant: http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/06/25/324941229/could-t... I guess that's another oops.
People are underestimating this virus and whenever you underestimate something you generally later regret it. Hopefully I'm wrong for example, but I see too many people sending their sick kids to school and so on. I just think that although we can stop it, it's not nearly as easy as it's made it to be. And we need to stop it sooner than later. I hope I'm wrong but I dont want to find out the hard way. Assuming were bettr than a virus is never wise...
If the under estimation is by a factor of 5 then you're looking at 44.8 million.
The exponential value is really important, especially in the early and end games ;)
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/09/23/world/africa/23ebola.ht...
http://racingheartblog.tumblr.com
Considering the doubling rate I would personally increase that number by at least 2-5 doublings...
Unfortunately saying you did understand the language is not a valid reason. It sucks but that's also the reason why thee were so many bad mortgages in the recent real estate bust. Too many people didn't read their mortgage agreements.
As the saying goes everything is good while it's good and everything goes bad when it goes bad.
Basically I would first try to reduce the size of the problem while trying to get domain expertise. I wouldn't consider a rewrite at this stage...