It'd make sense, as both have had massive price drops recently, and haven't had a battery upgrade in two years.
717 karma · joined August 18, 2015
It'd make sense, as both have had massive price drops recently, and haven't had a battery upgrade in two years.
It sounds like "saved people a bit of time by doing all the things separate services used to do".
I see espionage on a massive scale. I see democracies weakened for profit. I see self-obsessed shallow folks constantly taking selfies to post online. I see the degeneration of political discourse into pithy statements that can be 'liked'.
What good have they done, exactly? Helped people share photos and status updates?
I've never understood the appeal of electric bikes. It just seems lazy to me. I'd feel guilty if I relied on the motor instead of burning calories.
I use the cars for transporting the family, or to go long distances quickly. I'm not averse to cycling 25 miles if time allows, and I've also managed to carry all sorts (like IKEA furniture) on my folding bike. I also wear my work clothes (jeans and t-shirt) when cycling on my commute, demonstrating that lycra is totally unnecessary!
I can only assume that electric bikes are for people that wouldn't normally cycle, or whose routes are prohibitively hilly.
Would be keen to hear the use cases of anyone here that uses one.
I'd rather have ten mediocre developers who can be part of a team than one gifted diva.
I got 9 friends to install Signal yesterday to help them away from WhatsApp. I'd love to see widespread campaign to encourage people to ditch these parasites we're addicted to.
It dates back to medeival eating traditions when folks only had a knife - therefore, it was held in the right hand as it was the primary and only implement.
Fast forward to the present day, and the fork is the primary implement. Hence, to my mind, it makes significantly more aense to hold the fork in one's dominant hand.
When you select full self-driving capability in the Tesla configurator, it states explicitly and prominently that this isn't enabled (or ready!) yet, and is subject to legal approval.
Anyone that buys a Tesla, thinks it is fully autonomous, and dies as a result is failing natural selection. Third parties (pedestrians and other drivers) on the other hand are victims, but have there been any examples of this with Tesla cars? My not-full-self-driving AP2 Model X can detect pedestrians, and will also emergency stop if it detects things. This is aside from the fact I, as the driver, should be emergency stopping if I see a forthcoming collision with a pedestrian!
Think of Autopilot like a horse. You still need a driver, but at least you've got another set of eyes on the road. Sometimes it will notice things you don't, sometimes it will get spooked by things it shouldn't do, but two sets of eyes/two brains are better than one.
I see no advantage of returning error types over checked exceptions. I'm happy to be informed, though.
All their CI and release problems traced back to it.
At the risk of sounding like an old git, package coupling and package cohesion principles were defined for a reason.
I do feel like a lot of patterns in contemporary development are kneejerk reactions to how last generation's programmers did things.
Exceptions? Nah, multiple returns! Dependency management? Who needs it... Oh, wait.
Many small, single-responsibility repos? Wang it all in one, and then invent your own tooling to cope with it!
Hopefully soon people will look at piston cars like IT folks look at manual deployment to dedicated servers.
You're doing devops wrong, which may explain why you're having a bad time with the platform.
> I have to login to PCF to check environments or add services to bind to an app.
You should automate this with CI servers and pipelines.
The complaints about RAM usage and support service I agree with.
It sounds like your organisation is disfunctional, and its treatment of PCF is the symptom not the cause.