DiggyJohnson

Lawn mowing seems like one of the more dangerous things that a typical person does. It's the snow shoveling of the summer.

That’s a pretty bold take. I bet they’re a few months out. And I don’t think it makes sense to characterize it as a “field day” for stripe’s legal department - trademark enforcement isn’t a profit center. More likely a lightly edited boilerplate letter and a timeline to comply, which GP has already acknowledged.

What do you like about their UI and what are your main use cases?

Well said. And same with “schools” and then even more with “schooled”. But just for those who word it in a way that mind the rule.

Fantastic link. Does anyone know how he produced his animated slides and how they were controlled during the talk?

> it would suck for the ruling class though because we'd have to stop feeding kids religion

This seems out of place and unrelated. If anything Gen Z and presumable Alpha, eventually, are more religious than their parents.

This seems like a rather unimportant type of mistake, especially because the definition is still accurate, it’s just the etymology isn’t complete.

Spiritual boomers?

Are you being serious?

What was the nature of her illness and was it directly related to the kids? If you don’t mind me asking, of course. That sounds like a very challenging thing all the best

This is a much more reasonable position than many will believe. I think writing like a 19th century nonfiction author probably contributes to that aha

Edit:

To be clear I appreciate this comment and agree with it in the large. It’s hard to talk about these things without being quickly dismissed in the current zeitgeist.

What you think of as a “floor” is more accurately described as hanging off the support structure.

What do you think he means when he says “how the story ends”?

I think that would lead to even less civilized relationships between politicians and parties. Politicians throwing their rivals into courts and prison is not usually an aspect of a healthy civil society.

Amen, similar experience here. There are parts of the US federal government that aspire to and excel in the way you have described.

Of course the opposite is true too. But it bothers me that much of the discourse on both sides tend to ignore the high functioning projects and sectors. It’s a cool professional experience to take part in.

Slow down by pulling on the fishing line tied to the back of it, carefully.

US English doesn’t really have an informal version of “sir” for the situation you described. Closest would be “hey” or “yo” etc. but those aren’t even (pro)nouns.

Same. I work with a girl with first name Emily last name rhymes with “Wacky”. The latter is so much for fun to say and avoids collisions.

Your comments boggles me. You understand their point and immediately misapply that understanding.

Small tech firms are notorious outliers when it comes to this though

Interesting perspective. A lot of the nuance and disagreement comes from what we mean when we say “incapable”.

We should all close our eyes and imagine the insanity of two stars directly colliding. My goodness.

My lay question is would the discovery of a fuckton of cold objects like dust or rogue planets or cold sub brown dwarfs clear up the dark matter issue regarding the spin of galaxies?

I'm not sure how that is relevant. Pulling up someone's unrelated comments because you disagree with the current discussion is discouraged at best.

because of the information / functionality density and the fact that it's optimized for power users

> 20x

What do you think the actual number is in terms of dedicated hours per day?

Private property though so they could eject you right?

There's a middle ground between cheap and beautiful: "functional". I think you're being a bit hyperbolic in this discussion.

I think their point is a good one: that there is a reason that things got this way and it’s easy to underestimate the costs associated with beauty.

I wouldn’t read it as a “beef with beauty”.

Thanks for the explanation that’s very interesting.