10,074 karma · joined May 29, 2014
* @DamnInteresting@mastodon.cloud
Our modern view of the Luddites is not a fair shake. The Luddites were not opposed to technology in general, they merely (and understandably) opposed having their own livelihoods replaced by automation.[1] It's a familiar sentiment in these times.
Incidentally, I'm not implying that you don't know what the original Luddites were about; I add my comment for the benefit of anyone else who may be unfamiliar with the backstory.
The detail many seem to forget is that "AI" is Artificially Inexpensive. It must eventually turn a profit, or collapse. Once providers start charging what they must to remain solvent, and/or the output is burdened with advertising, the gains, real or perceived, will likely evaporate.
[1] https://history.howstuffworks.com/european-history/habsburg-...
When I see these sophisticated phishing messages I like to click through and check out how well-made the phishing site itself is, sometimes I fill their form with bogus info to waste their time. So I opened the link in a sandboxed window, looked around, entered nothing into any forms.
It turns out the email was from a pen testing firm my employer had hired, and it had a code baked into the url linked to me. So they reported that I had been successfully phished, even though I never input any data, let alone anything sensitive.
If that's the bar pen testing firms use to say that they've succeeded in phishing, then it's not very useful.
I had a similar peculiarity with eyeglasses. I'd always had great vision, but middle age recently hit me like a truck, and my eyes have started to go. I got a prescription, and there was a difference between the two eyes. For the first few days, everything looked misshapen, larger on one side than the other, until my brain compensated. Most curious.
I have seldom (probably never) seen anyone have a big change of heart from such discussion, but often both sides concede a little, and it feels like progress toward common ground, minuscule though it may be.
(Unless, of course, you were saying "Boooourrrns")
I suspect that you are being facetious, but for the benefit of anyone else reading, this is not true. It's a "factoid" (an invented fact mistaken as true)[1] spawned from a joke on the TV program Seinfeld[2].
This has been your daily wet blanket.
It seems unlikely that changing one's current password will ameliorate future phishing using these data. The password isn't the problem here.
[1] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/bulls...
A link from HN: Usually comes with thoughtful discussion, and a detectable but temporary uptick in site donations (it's an ad-free, reader-supported project). There are always some detractors, but that's to be expected.
A link from a popular subreddit: A LOT of site traffic and server overload (once in 2015, Google Analytics showed over 6,600 concurrent visitors from /r/TodayILearned), and a lot more bile in the inbox and discussion thread. No uptick in donations.
No surprises there really, but it's useful to verify assumptions.
> Feel free to let djtango know that the paper they're looking for is Bergen (2001), "Nativization processes in L1 Esperanto". It's a minor classic and deserves any attention it gets!
I searched for the title, and this PDF was among the top matches: https://pages.ucsd.edu/~bkbergen/papers/NEJCL.pdf
[1] https://bsky.app/profile/librarycongress.bsky.social/post/3l...
[1] https://www.metafilter.com/209750/Godfrey-Reggios-Koyaanisqa...
[2] https://www.damninteresting.com/the-baader-meinhof-phenomeno...