1,466 karma · joined January 29, 2020
> At Linkedin, we are using this curriculum for onboarding our non-traditional hires and new college grads into the SRE role.
Where I get stuck, and maybe someone could help me here-- generally, you don't have to try to hard to imagine a future with cryptocurrency being more useful then it is today. That is, it is more valuable. BUT, why should that mean that its price should be higher? It's like looking at the pithy saying, "price is not value" in reverse.
Certainly some devs need more than 16gb, but they know who they are. And you know who they are because, well, they love telling you :).
I find that comment interesting since current state of the art in trauma resuscitation is transfusing relatively early, based on solid data out of the Iraq war.
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/tree/master/Formul...
But really, slowing the phones down to extend battery life is a reasonable tradeoff and there's just not a preponderance of evidence suggesting Apple acted in its own interests and hurt existing users. The main problem is this "feature" wasn't out in the open, but again, it just doesn't seem that bad to me.
I think there's some nuance and technicality to this, because even though the ports themselves could meet Thunderbolt 4 specs under different conditions, they don't in the current configurations. Apple deliberately calls these "Thunderbolt / USB 4" ports, leaving out the version number from Thunderbolt. One of the requirements of a Thunderbolt 4 port is it can drive 2 4k displays, which Apple is very clear it cannot in the current models. So, that alone makes these not Thunderbolt 4. I don't think anyone's tested the rest of the Thunderbolt 4 features to know which ones are and aren't present.
https://newsroom.intel.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2020/...
For those who don't know, IE11 is the last major release of IE. Between a major frontend framework feeling confident dropping IE, and Apple dropping Intel it kind of feels like the end of an era.
I think consensus is we don't know for sure, but there's reason to be hopeful. SARS-CoV-2 probably won't evolve as fast as the flu, which undergoes a "sexual-like" evolution process called "re-assortment." On the other hand, CoV-2 has "re-combination," which gives similar results, and it does have zoonotic hosts.
This is the first in-depth review validating all the hype. Assuming the user experience, Rosetta2 things, first generation pains, kernel panics, are all in-check, it's amazing. At this point I'm mostly interested in the Air's performance with its missing fan.
Original article-- https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2022483
They did a meta analysis (summarizing many, many studies) focusing on chili peppers and mortality, and reported the results. What’s interesting in the graphic in the link provided is that the correlation is present in basically every study shown. It’s very strong evidence for a correlation. On the other hand it’s very hard to explain causality without bringing out general terms like “antioxidants” or, possibly much more likely, confounding variables. It would be helpful to look at confounding variables, but those aren’t available yetis the study is not public. Simply put, it’s an interesting presentation but you can’t draw much useful inference without actually seeing the content of the presentation. That and their study has not meant the rigors of a peer-reviewed article yet.
* Really any career, it just needs to involve doing something people want and ideally rewards continuous improvement.
Here’s a few examples— https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/https...
Even if you use a more realistic number and want to focus on the top 0.0000003%, that's very different than taxing people who earn income as a linear function of their hours worked.
Actual taxes on the 1% in the 50s weren't really that much higher, despite the marginal rates-- https://taxfoundation.org/taxes-on-the-rich-1950s-not-high/