I'd expect commenters on tech-oriented site to understand how uBlock Origin works... or at the very least how to check the browser console instead of fearmongering.
822 karma · joined January 7, 2022
I'd expect commenters on tech-oriented site to understand how uBlock Origin works... or at the very least how to check the browser console instead of fearmongering.
It's 49 USD per user per month for Code Search, like what the hell man? It's more than twice as expensive as Github Enterprise. Almost twice the cost of Gitlab Premium.
At some point it was 100USD per month per dev, I also remember it being "Starts from 5k USD per year", you can find some quotes for that in old submissions regarding Sourcegraph going open, closed, open and closed again.
"Sourcegraph is no longer open source" by me, from last year
"We run a pretty java-heavy environment, with multiple large JVMs configured per host. The problem is that the heap sizes have been getting larger, and we were running in an overcommitted situation and did not realize it. The JVMs would all start up and malloc() their large heaps, and then at some later time once enough of the heaps were actually used, the OOM killer would kick in and more or less randomly off one of our JVMs."
I know that 2007 may have been different times, but I'd argue that max heaps for all your JVMs running on a system probably shouldn't exceed around 88% of the total system memory. (percentage goes up as the total system memory goes up from 128GB -> 256GB -> 512GB)
I've resisted this, because I know that I can sleep peacefully at night when the inevitable monthly "GitLab Critical Patch Release" email comes.
Constant breakage unless you're using snaps on the most popular distributions. The CLI is absolutely idiotic and convoluted and the plugins do a lot of guess work without informing you, which results in some fun debugging. It's also a large pile of dependencies that take up space.
My company is a paid customer since around 2020 and we are very satisfied, easily beats the Datadog's (which we use for the rest of our infra and apps) observability offering for PostgreSQL.
I'm sick of this trend of successful attacks being basically free marketing, while successful defences and maintainers working long hours for free to keep open source software secure never receive any praise.
Things have changed in the last 10 years. Long gone are the days of only using signature databases.
https://attackevals.mitre-engenuity.org/results/enterprise?v...
I know, because I've been writing small malware toys and it got blasted by both Bitdefender and ESET.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_Waffen_Grenadier_Division...
Haven't really noticed any issues on Firefox except the lack of actually good web translator.
-moz-element looks sweet, hope it comes to other browsers.
I like paying for things that I use and bring me value, but at the moment Sourcegraph is a hard sell due to high cost compared to small company size and being based outside of Western Europe and US.
It's no wonder, that the usage of OSS version was pretty low, when few were able to build it and even if they managed that, the resulting application was broken every few releases.
Both VS Code and Chromium are easy to build, due to their nature and popularity, they are available prebuilt from many sources. I would install "unofficial" Chromium build from my distribution's repository, I wouldn't keep my code in unofficial Sourcegraph build from some random person on Github. Comparing them is rather unfair, but there's another issue that stopped OSS adoption.
For a long time, official Sourcegraph Docker image came with a 10 seat free license, which suited many people and they weren't looking for alternatives like OSS build.
I would argue that announcing license change and closing of your product as a small block in change log file or when someone mentions the problem in Github Issues is not adequate for such a change.
Not using open-first principles, restricting the product by using enterprise only plugins, which others mentioned under this post, not providing open source builds and changing license without preceding announcement, while previously using open source terminology for some feel-good free marketing leaves a bitter taste. Especially with so many companies doing this right now due to interest rates.
https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/issues/43231 https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/issues/43203 https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/issues/6790 https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/issues/6783