BohuTANG

Recommand Apache OpenDAL if you're using S3 to access your data. It's a unified data access layer that simplifies pulling data across different storage backends. https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal

We(Databend Labs) benchmarked #TPCH-SF100 on S3, Wasabi, Backblaze B2, and Cloudflare R2: #S3 leads with its direct connect feature. #Wasabi offers good performance. #B2 and #R2 may not be suitable for big data needs

Details: https://twitter.com/DatabendLabs/status/1719580350677237987

DatabendLabs benchmarked TPCH-SF100 on Amazon S3, Wasabi, Backblaze B2, and Cloudflare R2.

Indeed, under a pay-as-you-go model, if there's a lack of precise control over the warehouse, such as a 10-minute suspension, it could lead to significant waste. This is because most queries might only take a few seconds, and the rest of the time is wasted. If you find Snowflake expensive, consider Databend. It's an open-source, cost-efficient alternative to Snowflake, and it maintains a consistent product experience with Snowflake.

Open-source: https://github.com/datafuselabs/databend Databend vs. Snowflake: https://github.com/datafuselabs/databend/issues/13059 Cloud: https://app.databend.com/

Good job! Databend has a AI_TO_SQL function to do it: https://databend.rs/doc/sql-functions/ai-functions/ai-to-sql

Well. 1. With the improvement of the rust ecosystem, using rust has made database development faster and easy, for example datafuse use the tokio to implement the pipeline https://github.com/datafuselabs/datafuse/tree/master/fuseque....

2. Couldn't agree with you more with easier-to-manage as a first-class feature, but some times easier-to-manage is built on stability, that's what datafuse is trying to do.

Sure, datafuse is still working in progress. TPCH (mainly for JOIN) will be fully supported in Beta version. Datafuse team are mainly working on the Alpha version.

Datafuse team mainly from the ClickHouse community, but more focused on the cloud database. Datafuse Labs team: https://github.com/orgs/datafuselabs/people

Hello, The different than the more than 100 other NoSQL databases are: nessDB is very fast, on-disk storage engine,it's using LSM-Tree, which has a very better performance than B+Trees.There are a performance comparison test with tcbdb,MongoDB here:http://paste2.org/p/1844476 nessDB is a disk-storage engine, I think this is the main different with Redis DB.

Thanks, BohuTANG

And supports Redis-Protocol(PING,SET,MSET,GET,MGET,DEL,EXISTS,INFO,SHUTDOWN).