171 karma · joined July 22, 2023
Isn’t the best argument for open source code that it has so many people, most companies can not afford such a global quality assurance.
Is the ZFS team handling encryption as a first class priority at all?
ZFS on Linux inherited a lot of fame from ZFS on Solaris, but everyone using it in production should study the issue tracker very well for a realistic impression of the situation.
It’s still not supported by Proxmox, yes, you can do it yourself somehow but you are alone then and miss features and people report problems with double or triple file system layers.
I do not understand how they have not encryption out of the box, this seems to be a problem.
Bad decision to force people to put a stamp on them just to sign up!
Is there any systematic study going on about the mechanism of censorship in the fediverse?
Very sad state of affairs.
Still the same picture, encryption seems to be not a first class citizen in ZFS land.
Look, even Proxmox, which I totally expected to support encryption with default installation (it has „Enterprise“ on the website) does loose important features when trying to use with encryption.
Also please study the issue tracker, there are a few surprising things I would not have expected to exist in a productive file system.
Would it be easier to just provide simple audio files?
Generally this is a very interesting question hat could be discussed in a very long thread, but still the reader will not get any value from it.
Do you have any recommendations?
Thanks!