1,022 karma · joined June 22, 2024
[Citation Needed]
The claim is that Tylenol is a factor that increases the risk of autism. It is not the cause of 100% of all cases.
That said, the first synthesis of Paracetamol in the USA was Johns Hopkins in 1877, so maybe the answer is they went to Baltimore.
There's a document that gets posted every so often here called The Return Rate on Everything. In it, it says that the returns on capital outweigh economic growth, meaning capital gets more concentrated, at all times except during war.
So the answer to your question would seem to be 'war'.
Nope, they do gain weight, or avoid gaining weight by counting calories [0]
> Someone posted the footage online. A pile-up ensued. And their lives were turned upside down.
No, they created a situation where their lives would inevitably be turned upside down, and one of many possible triggers was hit.
> any of us might, for any particular reason, become... flawed people in the wrong place at the wrong time
No, they are people who chose to break their word to their spouses, and to break the social contract.
> the viral potential of these kinds of stories is a warning sign that our culture is obsessed with shame, surveillance, and control.
Shame is how a society polices its members without violence. Shame is good because it leaves the parties healthier than the alternative. They deserved to be shamed.
> An obsession with other people’s private lives is a sickness.
No, it has been the normal state of humans for probably as long as humans have existed. Humans survive in groups.
And if it was still legit after that, there would be days or weeks of waiting for the transfer to actually happen, during which time I could call and cancel.
You did not comprehend my comments, because I did not.
> And while it might be sound legal advice to shut your mouth, it's not necessarily the moral thing to do.
I hope that you argue that the 5th amendment is immoral when anyone uses it, and not just pastors.
> If the person leading the congregation is making significantly more than the poorest of the congregation there's a real problem.
Ideally a congregation will include all of society, which will include people making zero, so your argument becomes that a pastor making significantly more than zero is immoral.
I would challenge you to find a moral basis for that in the Bible.
From what I've heard, he has disclosed actions years, possibly decades, ago but did not mention that involvement of a minor. I expect this is because a lawyer, or possibly anyone with a quarter of a brain, gave the same advice to him as they would any other human - shut your mouth. Is that a wrong?
> And now he's suing the church for millions of dollars for some retirement he feels he's entitled to.
One article [0] says "his attorney sent a letter to church lawyers [demanding] more than $1 million that had accrued in Morris's retirement account". Again, I suspect that he is getting advice from lawyers to do what they would advise any other human to do - collect on earned retirement benefits. Is that a wrong?
> He's massively enriching himself, to continue living a lavish lifestyle
If you'll forgive the crudeness of this comparison, I expect that running a church of 100,000 attendees to be of comparable, but not equal, complexity as a company with 100,000 customers. That could make running Gateway in the same ballpark as running Asana. The CEO of Asana gets 15 million a year for his trouble. Morris got, what, 5% of that? 3%? Is it self-enrichment to offer world-class leadership to a church at a 95% discount to its free market value?
[0] https://www.cbsnews.com/texas/news/robert-morris-gateway-chu...
https://nypost.com/2021/05/12/hertz-investors-snag-8-a-share...
Why does that matter? There are abuses happening now, every day, by high profile. Some (Epstein, Diddy) are starting to be caught. Others (Drake) may face judgement far into the future. Others (Chris Brown) never will.
If criticizing modern church culture requires referencing acts of 40 years ago, and criticizing secular culture requires references acts that happened recently, and will probably happen again tomorrow, that could indicate that the modern USA church is doing better than we think. Possibly a lot better.