At least give people the option to start moving away from GitHub to contribute to your project. It will, ultimately, be better for the ecosystem.
1,391 karma · joined March 16, 2018
At least give people the option to start moving away from GitHub to contribute to your project. It will, ultimately, be better for the ecosystem.
As an ex-googler, the only reason I was comfortable keeping even my personal email there was because I could reach out internally if there was a problem. I left Google, and left gmail behind too.
That's what they did?
Perimeter length = 2*335mm + 2*235mm
Wall height diff = 2mm
Wall width = 1mm
(2*335 + 2*235) * 2mm * 1mm = 2,280 mm^3
I want to pay for CI on my Codeberg projects, but I've been struggling to find something where I can just pay by the minute. I have projects that benefit from large CI runners but my usage is low enough that it makes no sense to host my own.
I'm not trying to defend Apple here, I'm just curious if there would be some kind of carrier validation issues if you slapped a full desktop OS on a phone.
I'm a fan of that model. IIt allows for a path to funding, a legal framework to keep contributed code open, and also allows them license agility to more permissive license ass needed. I've started using that for my own larger projects too.
https://element.io/blog/synapse-now-lives-at-github-com-elem...
Granted, that's 20 to 60 years down the line...
Oh this explains it:
> Starting with the Olympic and Paralympic Games Milan-Cortina 2026, and going at least through the 2032 Games, every U.S. Olympian and Paralympian will receive $200,000 in financial benefits for each Games in which they compete:
I recently added better backend support for deployments, converted everything to async Rust, and setup Nix/Docker releases. I'm planning to build out some better example apps and workflows next, but everything will stay pre-alpha/unstable for now so that I can avoid getting locked in to any foundational issues. There are still a number of low-hanging breaking issues blocking the end-to-end usage which I'll need to address.
Charging for self-hosted runners is an interesting choice. That's the same cost as their smallest hosted runners [1]
[1] - https://docs.github.com/en/billing/reference/actions-runner-...
A tech company that publishes the postmortems when possible always get a +1 in my eyes, I think it's a sign of good company culture. Cloudflare's are great and I would love to see more from others in the industry.
Eidetica - a decentralized database built in Rust, intended for local-first apps. It's still unstable but I'm progressing relatively rapidly. In the past ~month I have:
- Flown to SF to attend a conference in this niche: https://syncconf.dev/
- Added password based, transparent, end-to-end encryption
- Improved my custom CRDTs
- Added an index to store configs and metadata
- Built support for using sqlite + postgres for Eideticas backend (not pushed yet)
Once I finish the backend work I'll hopefully take a bit of a break though. I'm supposed to be retired.
The example here looks like it may be storing the full history of transactions? Is that right? That's a pretty high cost to pay for something that's not touted as a marquee feature.
I'm working on a DB[1] that stores full transaction history but it's so that I can support decentralized synchronization. It's in service of my marquee feature so I need to pay the cost of storing history, but I'm surprised that Stoolap also seems to be doing it for a local embedded database.
If you want to use something, and your company makes $240,000,000 in annual revenue, you should probably pay for it.
Please fund projects that actually need it, and don't voluntarily gift money to a literal billionaire.
> I get asked the same about terminals all the time. “How will you turn this into a business? What’s the monetization strategy?” The monetization strategy is that my bank account has 3 commas mate.
Original post: https://x.com/mitchellh/status/1964785527741427940
I push to Github and then an Action mirrors the code to Codeberg automatically.
I'd fully switch over except practically everybody is on Github and nobody is on Codeberg, and I've had more outages with Codeberg than Github over the past year.
It really feels like there could be some good tooling in this area to make working through multiple Forge's easier and not force things to be centralized so much. Hopefully more projects moving out of Github makes it easier and gets more people contributing elsewhere.