It has a couple libraries for window management. One is plug and play, the other is lower level. Here is my config for setting up a 2x2 grid: https://github.com/andrewhampton/dotfiles/blob/master/hammer...
915 karma · joined January 13, 2009
It has a couple libraries for window management. One is plug and play, the other is lower level. Here is my config for setting up a 2x2 grid: https://github.com/andrewhampton/dotfiles/blob/master/hammer...
> With Docker we were supposed not to have installation instructions (aside from a few docker run arguments). We were supposed to run containers. Swarm fulfils that promise and Kubernetes doesn’t.
We run Kubernetes on CoreOS and every piece runs in a container. On the master, the api-server, controller and scheduler all run in docker containers. On the minions, the proxy and kubelet both run in containers.
> Another thing I dislike about Kubernetes is its need to know things in advance, before the setup. You need to tell it the addresses of all your nodes, which role each of them has, how many minions there are in the cluster and so on.
The master does not need to know the these things. Minions do need to know the address of the master, but they can self-register with master and join the cluster anytime.
With that being said, it did take two of our senior devs over a week to get a cluster we were happy with. I'm a fan of docker compose, and hope swarm becomes a good competitor to Kubernetes. I don't think it's there yet though.
Kamal, what resources are you using to learn the information in these posts?
However, our front end apps is where we're running into trouble. The people on the front end want to run through everything in their browser to make sure everything works and looks good.
We use docker and fig (now docker-compose) to run all our apps. So we've been talking about using compose's new external_links feature to link each app together.
I hadn't heard of moutebank though, so thanks for the link!
For example, let's I am working on service A, which depends on services B and C. Do I need to run all 3 apps and their data stores locally?
We currently will typically point A to the staging B and C. However, we have some long running jobs that A will initiate on B and B needs to post back to A when it's finished. This doesn't work when pointing to staging B.
However, after reading "This is a simple functional PR..." in the blog post, I was surprised to see the PR adds over 38k lines of code. Seems like that will take a while to review.
Reading for looking for something specific.
The mjolnir community does have an actively developed fork though called hammerspoon. http://www.hammerspoon.org/
I would recommend either of them, but hammerspoon has a smoother onboarding process.
https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/blob/master/CHANGELOG.m...
> If a consumer requests access to a website or service, and the content is legal, your ISP should not be permitted to block it.
This implies that ISPs would be permitted to block illegal content. How can they know traffic is legal without some form of traffic monitoring/inspection?
Additionally, I almost brought this up in my original post, but decided against it, but "lawful content" is another phrase I commonly see in the same discussions. IANAL, but my understanding is that unlawful != illegal. "Lawful" means the subject is specifically addressed and permitted by law, and "unlawful" is anything else. So traffic can be legal, but not lawful.
My biggest fear is that we in the tech community will rally behind a net neutrality law which sounds good in theory, but ends up a nightmare in practice. Phrases like "ISPs will not be able to filter lawful content" are nowhere close to "ISPs will not be able to filter traffic". I'd much prefer the latter in a net neutrality law.
> If a consumer requests access to a website or service, and the content is legal, your ISP should not be permitted to block it.
Specifically "and the content is legal" is what raises a flag for me. I've seen similar phrases in nearly everything I've read coming from any government official regarding net neutrality.
If this phrasing makes it into eventual laws regarding net neutrality, it seems to me that it could easily require inspection of all traffic by ISPs to ensure the legality of traffic.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16647069/should-i-use-vag...
Here's my config for anyone who's curious: https://github.com/andrewhampton/dotfiles