13,724 karma · joined August 28, 2011
I love most of the language, but I'm convinced it was written by people who type 300 wpm.
Here is the much more readable PDF.
That would smell sorta good, its a nice 'round' scent.
But many of the same issues still exist, poorly defined requirements being the primary one.
I also feel like some of this, being starliner or SLS issues are shades of the "good, fast, cheap, pick two" problem.
It shouldn't have been allowed to happen, period.
I get that what I said will not be popular, but this has been the consensus of every previous thread on this topic that I've seen - NASA is sorta playing the role of a systems integrator here, and assumes the liability for defective components from their subcontractors, and has the ultimate supervision authority to decide if something can or cannot fly.
http://autovon.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/BELL-LAB-RECOR...
Looks like he passed in 1979, at the ripe old age of 90, we should all be so lucky!
Now I'm an Extra, and have been licensed long enough to join the QCWA.
Some of the best RF guys I know, have no formal training - because there is important theory around RF - it doesn't always work like projected.
In my industry a Ham Ticket has taken the place of a GROL as something employers look upon favorably, because it means you generally should already have a foundation of RF theory.
As far as the bill - you'd be billed for local service (either unlimited or metered rate), plus a phone rental, and then on top of that local toll and long distance usage. For this, you got a telephone, and the phone company was responsible for your inside wiring as well.
For me, as someone who spent some portion of my career in wireline telephony, I feel these losses acutely, particularly as the copper wireline network dies - the fact that all of this infrastructure was built by one company was not lost on me, and was very obvious early in my career - but is less so now.