Akcium

I was working on my branch as usual. Today I checked git status and found out that I'm in the process of rebase. I was afraid a little, and decided to abort it.

I lost my changes.

When to git reflog, saw tons of commits, tried to cherry pick the one that has my changes.

Now, I have my branch with my changes. But. If I pull from origin, I lost them. If I push force the branch, I'll erase other devs changes.

It's so confusing =(

Names are a whole different topic, take a look at THIS: https://twitter.com/Hung_TT_Nguyen/status/150393686591691981...

One option is switching to a self-hosted PaaS — basically setting up a Heroku-like platform on your VPS/server that allows to deploy apps, provision SSL/set up reversy proxy, and monitor usage. That's what we're doing with Gardens, our new open-source product.

It allows you to: - Connect to your cloud provider, provision and configure a droplet, automatically set up reverse proxy - Deploy apps from your Github/Gitlab/Bitbucket, with CI/CD integration, using CLI or Web UI, or deploy in one click from a library of 130+ open-source/fair-code apps - Get native analytics with NetData, join a federated community with posts from big open-source Co's, easily write step-by-step guides for your tools, and more

We just launched, so curious to hear feedback from HN people! See more details via the link.

Thanks for this. Really.

Wish you luck with the project.

The thing is that it didn't have any "contemporary" tech stack or whatever, and the founder even didn't know about all that stuff like git.

But the site brought him thousands or even millions of dollars :D

Ah, I know why I remembered about that guy: because he hit the market when the COVID began, so it was probably very timely (everyone started working remotely and then when the COVID ended everyone went to nomad lifestyle)

It's not only hard for users, it's hard for developers, when they have scroll issues, when they should update each other, when you should keep track of URL (what if user hits F5 or wants to share these...modal hell)

Especially when the modal covers half of the page, with a form with dozens fields.

I guess the person who posted it checked out the URL that I have, and previously I indeed called it something like stop using modals.

The thing is that they are really OVERused. And right now I'm working on a project where we have modals inside modals and sometime even popup as a third layer. I cannot influence these decisions, but it's TOO much.

Well, technically I have a collection of emails right now, but I didn't mean to do it =\ Hm, maybe I can disable it.

But you can just put a random email, I believe that it'll be downloaded right away, apart from sending a link to an email. So yeah, I've just seen the emails and some of them are random, non-real emails

Next year I'll improve the quality of my newsletter, since I haven't had much time to work on it recently =\

But this tip is more about links I'd say, or maybe controls in slide gallery and stuff like that

Here is the site. So this guy literally gets drunk and then test your site.

I think he's genius :)

In my small company where I work, they call me team leader. Sometimes when I interview frontend devs, that are supposed to be junior, they know more than I do.

At least in theory.

I always see people say that "Hey, Middle should know this and that". Or "Junior should at least know this".

Why? Is Junior in Google and Junior in a small random company are the same skilled devs?

I think instead we should talk only about skills. What company needs is: hey, we have a VueJS project that uses a lot of d3.js. We need a guy who knows that. He might not know algorithms, or have a wide experience in high-load. We just need that guy, call him whatever you want.