1ark

Elixir is pretty good too. Elixir, Phoenix and Ecto have the best docs I have ever seen.

Switch to Nim and programming will be fun again.

There is also yabai.

https://github.com/koekeishiya/yabai

Use FOSS such as RustDesk, VNC or any other suitable solution.

Curious about the backup solution.

Anecdotally documentation in JS framework world is quite bad or missing. So maybe not much of an argument? Compare React documentation to Flutter for example. Also you do not have to update your framework more than necessary. Often times there's a dependency that needs to be updated that requires everything else to be updated and you spend a lot of extra time with that instead of just fixing whatever bug you were supposed to fix. Tradeoffs to both approaches of course.

Can also recommend the rewrite of NASM, YASM. https://yasm.tortall.net/

Correction, fixed. It is already working.

Bitcoin is consuming power to secure the integrity of the blockchain, that is the reason. It is not "no reason". If you could suggest another permissionless consensus mechanism, then Bitcoiners are open ears, it has been discussed many times at bitcoin-dev.

Bitcoin survived an attack from its own wealthy proponents, miners tried to increase the blocksize for speed, which resulted in the fork Bitcoin Cash. Possibly the number of validators will always outnumber miners.

And the code base is not stale.

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commits/master

Get children to school strike for housing every Friday?

In a way the absence of a meteoric rise of Monero is good, its supposed to be fungible money. The lack of traceability and origin of the coins bring concern though.

Can't crypto exchanges provide the same safety, security and trust as banks today? Everyone can choose to be their own custodian or not.

Usually this spectrum of decentralization is downplayed by all blockchains. When you look at their frontpage it's either not mentioned or hidden how it works, or how many nodes there are, how to become a node etc. Very dishonest and annoying. But the marketing and hype around the L1s overwhelms facts.

EVM seems to be the hottest, because of early entrance with its own langauges. But WebAssembly in Cosmos, and Solana favors Rust as a programming language but afaik you can use any LLVM compatible. After that it is just a matter of connecting a client to a node, usually done in the browser.

Lokinet and Session is pretty interesting, onion routing and Signal fork respectively. And as a user you don't even notice any of the crypto except for your seed phrase.

I think that's a good clarification, I agree with your point-of-view. The question is for how long this JPEG-NFT-bubble will go on, as long as Second Life or longer/shorter. The word "bubble" can be a bit loose definition, it might inflate/deflate slow/fast; and depending on that be relevant or irrelevant. Usually people seem to mean fast and blow off top, which might not necessarily be the case.

Anyone can be a liquidity provider in an automated market maker, AMM. So that is what has changed. It has not completely eliminated needs for arbiters to balance the pools, but a great deal, and HFT is not really possible.

I wonder of it's possible to make a stream of those assets without wasting the space personally. Basically a scripted torrent.

Except trading of Gravatars, right?

Correct, but to get access to the "exclusive guilds" on Discord you need to verify your NFT for respective guild.

Are games with virtual assets bubbles? The whole NFT space might be, but it's still value creation analog to games with virtual assets. Last 15 years we've gone from MMOs with lots of game and in some of them you could buy land plots, and of course shiny armor. To less game with casual mobile games and loot boxes, to now no game with social media flexing and NFTs.

Now _that_ is a coherent value statement!

Yes, trades on Ethereum and Bitcoin can be expensive, but there are other chains with subsecond finality and fees in cents. On a TradFi brokerage it is not possible to take part of in their market making. As your collateral is used for investing and not liquidity in the market making.

Free? I only know of Robinhood and that's only for US, and you get frontrun anyway. If you are interested in holding equities only for value appreciation then I can understand DeFi not sounding that interesting. But if you are into saving, lending, leverage or market making then it should at least tickle curiosity.

One purpose is to self govern and share the profits from trading, instead of giving banks and brokers those profits. That's already good enough.

From an consensus perspective PPoS (Pure Proof of Stake) and PoH (Proof of History) are next steps. If you want to send around USD you can use UST for example, an algorithmic stablecoin.

There is a some effort in Nim, called moe[1]. Nim has a lot of features similar to a Lisp, and is both compiled and scriptable. Of course, it requires contributions to make it usable as a daily driver, but I guess that is somewhat the point. The vision is sound imo.

1. https://github.com/fox0430/moe

This is the main reason I changed and do most of my work in Emacs, keyboard only. Using it in terminal is a bit of a bonus. Onivim2 seems promising in bridging the gap, but we'll see.

Beautiful, so content dense in those days

Yandex is pretty good. But where it really got Google beat is in reverse image search.

Reminds me of the days with a gnump3d server.