Are these statements verifiable? Honestly interested to learn more about every argument against Telegram.
357 karma · joined September 22, 2017
Fiat money derives its value from what you say, indeed. It is traded on exchanges because of that. But fungibility is only one of several factors. Money should also serve as store of value, but how long is highly debatable and the point.
- CSS, why?! It does not really work like CSS when it comes to positioning things, overlapping and so on. Compared to previous versions where these properties were in a dict or sent in to the component, they are now in either big string blocks or in separate files, removing syntax highlighting and/or locality.
- Cannot easily use debugging such as PDB because it hijacks Traceback and uses async. Maybe fine if you rely on other debugging tools.
- It lacks simple off-the-shelf components such as menu bars, so I built my own, but run into annoying artifacts as mentioned before.
Rich, the underlying rendering library is good, and simple enough. I ditched Textual for prompt_toolkit, and can still use Rich to render things in pt.
When docs are hard to navigate, read, and comprehend, then it's a red flag.
I could come up with a few hypothetical questions from this though: 1) do narcissists find “fail videos“ more amusing? 1.a) if yes, then it can be trained away by reminding them to reflect on the situations. This is normal training for narcissism, put them in other people’s shoes. 2) watching the same “fail videos” over and over again makes them boring? 2.a) it’s on the same line as previously, but instead the hope that it internalizes the seriousness of a situation.