This is a very bizarre response. Don't mind if I screenshot this and write an email. Very strange behaviour.
687 karma · joined December 1, 2022
This is a very bizarre response. Don't mind if I screenshot this and write an email. Very strange behaviour.
Britain overnight cannot have a fresh start from its past, even the royals have ties to other nations. The England that was always English never existed and its history will always be rooted in the British empire (where the sun never set).
And yes "decentralised" meaning we have personal echo-chambers or a swarm of Elon sycophant accounts with inflated number of views and bots mass liking each extremist post. LLMs are going to put astroturfing campaigns on steroids.
"Former British PM Boris Johnson says falling birthrates ‘best news in long time’"
"Mr Johnson said the promised productivity gains from AI should mean less need for population growth"
"They can’t simultaneously complain that machines are making human workers unnecessary while also demanding that we import or create more human beings to do the work.”"
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/babies/former-br...
I'm just pointing out that even with mobile phones becoming dramatically better over the past decade, that hasn't really led to the transformation of mobile apps (outside of games) that take advantage of those resources. If anything, developers have arguably become more lazy and we are seeing lower quality software being deployed because people now have enough RAM even for your 500mb static webpage. Do we really believe people will start becoming more ambitious with AI or will most suffer from skill atrophy and less agency?
>Overall, 42% of recent college graduates were classified as underemployed, the highest level since 2020.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2026/02/23/unem...
what do you think my comment said you halfwit.
https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report/publi... [1]
So far the responses are more about anecdotes than general trends.
China does behave in a very methodical way, but that does not mean it is not a hostile nation.
IQ is also only one (mediocre) signal you are putting a lot of emphasis on. India does not score well, yet it is clearly emerging and has very successful individuals from mathematics to chess.
Outside of "drives itself", I fail to see how much of what you described is unique. Seems very ordinary.
Going by your history, you clearly have a strong bias for China but adding spyware or putting countries into debt isn't virtuous.