Completely valid point and shows my shortcoming. I hope I will improve it. But with COVID19 and danger of going homeless, it has become hard for me to manage it all. But you are completely right.
1,139 karma · joined September 12, 2014
I do understand what you say. But that is not the case sadly.
P.S. I used to have extremely successful in person networking before COVID19.
It is unbelievable. It seems all the ads are literally lie. Nobody answers any email. Nobody even invites to any interview. I am starting to think all the ads are lie to import foreign workers.
P.S. I don’t know why my parent comments got negative vote. But I totally would vouch for his/her estimation.
They only care about long term market, which is HPC and ML workloads. Because Nvidia is destroying anybody in that market. Look at their stock.
I’ve got a news for Torvalds, it going to get bad for Intel.
With those fertility rate I would expect be around 1.2,1.3 for us which far far below replacement rate (let alone population growth).
When I say you cherrypick, I am talking about this:
https://www.reddit.com/r/COVID19/comments/g4tqvk/dutch_antib...
And so, so mare which I don’t have time to find one by one right now. Like the study from Finland, or other places.
I don’t have anything to add to this discussion, since this clearly shows you are incapable of research. One other point is there is non negligible amount of people who does not develop antibodies therefore they are not detected in serological tests. I would expect IFR go down.
(You could have find in other publications too:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.13.20101253v...
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.09.20033357v...
The only required skill required is googling and having open mind.)
“ Iceland, (1st May) reports ten deaths in 1798 patients, CFR. 0.56%. If we assumed 1% of the population (364,000) is infected, then the corresponding IFR would be 10/3640 = 0.3%. Iceland’s test and quarantine measures may have shielded the elderly group, and deaths may still go up as they lag infection by about two weeks.
Iceland’s higher rates of testing, the smaller population, and their ability to ascertain all those with Sars-CoV-2 means they can obtain. an accurate estimate of the CFR and the IFR during the pandemic (most countries will only be able to do this after the pandemic).
Current data from Iceland suggests their IFR is somewhere between 0.3% and 0.56%.” -CEBM
P.S. FYI Iceland has done more test than anybody I think (ratiowise).
I have a suggestion for you: READ MORE!
confirmation bias. Look at the other publications.
You can check this subreddit for publications: https://www.reddit.com/r/COVID19/
All most all the publications from the past 2 months show an IFR if 0.1-0.6 or at most 0.8%.
Now with more publications, data suggests an IFR of 0.1-0.6%. Which is pretty low and does not worth crashing the economy.
This does not mean vulnerable people has to pay the price no. It is trade off. We have to reopen and go back to normal, while helping vulnerable people.
Even some paper suggest far more infections than we thought.