It'd be interesting if you could point to a single example of someone taking both sides. I strongly doubt these are the same people.
882 karma · joined March 11, 2019
It'd be interesting if you could point to a single example of someone taking both sides. I strongly doubt these are the same people.
Traceroute is simple. Sure, there's lots you can do to enrich the data you receive (e.g, reverse DNS and geolocation), or sending multiple sequences to identify equal cost multipath. But these are not inherent or necessary to perform a traceroute.
And understanding why different protocols exhibit different behavior / observe different metrics, or why some nodes don't send ICMP TTL expired, is important. But that's more in line with what you call "using it to troubleshoot", which is not "how it works."
But "how traceroute works" is simple: First you send a packet with TTL=1, then you send a packet with TTL=2, and so on. That's it, that's how it works.
Curious what type of roles you interview for, are they networking-centric? Iirc this is CCNA-level material, I'd expect anyone working in networking to be able to describe how traceroute works. I've used it more as a smoke test question than a question that most people don't know.
> the threat actors managed to steal data containing the personal information of Dollar Tree and Family Dollar employees.
I don't see any indication that customers are impacted.
I worked on a team without a formatter for more than 5 years. I'm certain many people have done the same. "Essential" is overselling.
Personally, based on the 3.5 and 4.0 responses in this thread, I prefer 3.5.
Sure, I understand how github.com is protected here, but I'm also unaware of github pages being totally blacklisted by Google even though I'm certain there have been malicious pages hosted there.
You can only limit the blast radius so much if the product itself is "hosting user content."
How does github pages or neocities, for example, handle this kind of thing? Surely I can't bring down every github page by linking to a malicious Google drive file from my own page?
I would bet the poster you replied to had the same intent.
As is yours. The author of that comment has contact information in their information, why not unicast them?
> When our product’s uninstaller sees an undeletable file (possibly a DLL loaded in another process), it uses the MOVEFILE_DELAY_UNTIL_REBOOT flag to mark it for deletion, and warns the user “Please reboot as soon as possible to remove the remaining files.”
> However, some user uninstall our product, just to be able to reinstall it later, to the same location. And of course they ignored the warning. Once they reinstalled it, everything works, until a reboot.
His hotmail account I can get into no problem. There used to be a time when you would trust Google ten times more than Microsoft not to mess with your account, lock you out, delete you for inactivity. Those days are long gone, fuck Google.
It sure is.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2017/10...
This is a huge piece of it, stop ripping us off! This has been going on for decades -- from NiMH battery packs for power tools, to laptop batteries.
I assume a big difference in the danger aspect with the bike batteries is their size/capacity? Less to go wrong with a 2AH cordless drill battery, than a 20AH bike battery?
On what do you base this? Registration agreements allow quite a lot in favor of registrars and registries.
1) know someone who is already on the inside, who has earned enough reputation to get some invites, or
2) Idle in some IRC channel for anywhere from a few days to a few months, and then pass some quiz/interview to make sure you know the basics of torrent etiquette and such