Samuel Delany and the Past and Future of Science Fiction
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
I am seriously trying to understand.
For example, here are quotes where the past:
> Delany came of age at a time when the genre [of science fiction] was indeed characterized by gee-whiz futurism, machismo adventuring, and white, heterosexual heroes.
is contrasted with the present:
> In the contemporary science-fiction scene, Delany’s race and sexuality do not set him apart as starkly as they once did.
EDIT: Actually, I hesitate to presume on the legendary New Yorker proofreaders / fact checkers, but shouldn't it be 'macho' (an adjective), not 'machismo' (a noun), 'adventuring'?
I think this might be attributing too much malice to the author in question though; Larry C seems more like a somewhat thoughtless writer annoyed that his low-brow entertainment books are not considered to have the same merit as Dulaney's stuff, backed up by an echo chamber online community.
> I read the NAMBLA [Bulletin] fairly regularly and I think it is one of the most intelligent discussions of sexuality I've ever found.
Will Shetterly has a conversation with Delany on the subject at http://shetterly.blogspot.com/2014/07/a-conversation-with-sa... .
An email conversation about NAMBLA and sexuality with Samuel Delaney.
Probably a typo.
"“It’s socio-economic,” he said. In 1967, as the only black writer among the Nebula nominees, he didn’t represent the same kind of threat. But Delany believes that, as women and people of color start to have “economic heft,” there is a fear that what is “normal” will cease to enjoy the same position of power."
I'm not saying I support either of those, but after following them for a while it's hard not to pick up on biased coverage in the media.
Of course, the net effect of their effort has been, in practice, to favor white male authors, so the article is accurate at face value. I wouldn't expect the author to go in detail into something only tangentially related, either. It's just bothersome to see every controversy in traditionally geeky hobbies lately reduced to "white male bigots form hate mob," so even a relatively neutral mention feels biased sometimes.
He's a master, and his works are in a real sense masterworks. Whatever you start with, you'll probably find something to enjoy.
That smoke blown, it rewards patience with some wonderful writing and some gripping drama as well.
I think it works to read it a whole bunch of ways. When Katrina happened, it seemed like New Orleans was Bellona for a bit.