John Conway – The world’s most charismatic mathematician
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
He announced that the midterm would be open notes. We study accordingly. We get to the midterm, and he is in California for a conference. A grad student is proctoring. We tell him that that the professor told us that it would be open notes. The grad student chuckles, says no way, the students outraged, and the exam proceeds closed notes. I guess he forgot to tell his grad student!
My friend comes to the exam late, didn't hear about the closed notes update, takes the exam open notes (how did his neighbor not notice?), turns himself into Conway later. The class average was something like 32 points out of 95.
After the midterm results, he was dismayed that he "had clearly done a poor job teaching us," and proceeded to spend the next 3 lectures going over the first 6 weeks of the course at a furious pace.
A classmate had met Conway back at a summer math camp during High School. John Conway had a real bicycle around his neck. He proclaimed that in the future if she sees a John Conway without a bicycle around his neck, that he is not the real John Conway! (much to our dismay he never came to class with a bicycle around his neck. I think he did, however, come to class with a metal cloths hanger around his neck. I think he did a trick involving one or more of these that day)
If students seemed a bit sleepy during lecture, he would routinely start to suddenly lecture at the top of his lungs. I definitely remember jumping up in my seat many times because of this. In one occasion, he opted to take off his shoe and throw it as hard as he could at the window for similar effect.
He would lecture and write on the blackboard so fast that we would copy the blackboard furiously for 90 minutes. If I started 2 blackboards behind (there were 6 boards), I would usually not have caught up by the end of lecture.
[1] https://www.math.princeton.edu/undergraduate/course/mat217
Subsequently I was one of very few people he'd bother playing backgammon with because we'd both play stupidly fast, and switch between extreme style of play, almost at random. I'd usually lose, but he stayed and played because he found it interesting. He's very like a cat, in that he'll play with something for a time, then completely lose interest and walk away without a word.
Fascinating, and humbling, to spend time with someone just so far out of my league.
Knowing Conway, it probably was.
The thing about riding a unicycle is that you don't think of staying on top of it, you think about keeping it underneath you. Falling forwards? Pedal faster to bring it back under you. Falling backwards? Stop pedalling so you catch up. The side-to-side balance largely looks after itself when you're riding - it's different when you're idling.
But I'm not sure that's what he asked about. It was 31 years ago.
Sounds vaguely like track standing on a fixed gear. It's more like balancing a broom on your finger than trying to balance yourself on a rail.
I really love bikes of all varieties, but I've never messed with a unicycle. They seem fun. My friend has one; I'll have to try his sometime.
Because you mentioned torque and such, if you never have, check out this book: http://www.amazon.com/Bicycling-Science-David-Gordon-Wilson/...
I picked it up expecting to read a chapter here and there and ended up cover to covering it. Great read
“Conway is the rare sort of mathematician whose ability to connect his pet mathematical interests makes one wonder if he isn’t, at some level, shaping mathematical reality and not just exploring it. The example of this that I know best is a connection he discovered between sphere packing and games. These were two separate areas of study that Conway had arrived at by two different paths. So there’s no reason for them to be linked. But somehow, through the force of his personality, and the intensity of his passion, he bent the mathematical universe to his will.”
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLt5AfwLFPxWIL8XA1npoN...
Any ideas about how this is done?
http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/2011/06/a-nerds-way-to-walk-u...
> His invention is simple. Your steps should be in a cycle: short, long, long. Long in this case means a double step. Thus, you will cover five stairs in one short-long-long cycle. In addition, you should always start the first cycle on the same foot. Suppose you start on the left foot, then after two cycles you are back on the left foot, having covered ten stairs. While you are walking the stairs in this way, it is clear where you are in the cycle. By the end of the staircase, you will know the number of stairs modulo ten. Usually there are not a lot of stairs in a staircase, so you can easily estimate the total if you know the last digit of that number.
The maths department at my local University (Liverpool) organized meetings for kids from the surrounding region who were reasonably good at the subject, Conway came to one on a trip back to see his parents.
Nothing is stopping you other than your own will.
You may will yourself to act in a different manner, but the will of a moment frequently exhausts itself, leaving the collection of rhythms and habits built into you over the years. Or, to put it differently, we all have an equilibrium, a norm we tends towards in the absence of persistent and sustained external stimuli. Your will is a small stimulus for change, and it works over weeks and months in a series of small nudges.
You can change, in almost any way, but if you "just will yourself to do it", you'll most likely find yourself failing again and again, convinced that if you could only be (somehow) just a bit more stronger-willed, complete change is right around the corner.
Perhaps you mean "Just do it – envision what you wish to become, work out the set of habits necessary to that new person, and slowly rework your present habits, one by one, (removing environmental triggers/cues to old habits, and redirecting their behavioral outcomes), until you've discarded or transformed the old set into the new.
Nothing is stopping you other than [a clear goal, a choice, and steadily repeated applications of] your own will."
You're agreeing with me. Yes, it's hard. So what if it's hard? It's a matter of second-by-second choices. Failed? ok, that's in the past. Might fail? ok, that's in the future. You're in the present. Just do it.
And perhaps I should buy a certain brand of trainers?
I'm still an introvert but I didn't let that stand in my way.