It's digitally signed and then the officer's recording system uploads it securely to the police servers when back at the station. This is all to maintain a complete chain-of-custody, so when used as evidence in court it can't be easily dismissed or disregarded by the criminal's attorney.
It can't be edited because there wouldn't be a digital signature!!!?
Cameras will malfunction but not like you're saying they will.
Also the parent says "There are some evidence recording systems..." We don't know if this police department's system is one of those.
Keep commenting. Moderate yourself; Fuck karma... just stay positive, I don't know what happens to the people <0. I heard they burn the bodies for fuel to run the server.
Oh no, you attempted two-level sarcasm? That simply won't work here. b^)
You'd think I wouldn't be getting killed here. Everything is falling flat. Bah humbug.
1. "The Truth About Satire" -- Faye Weather, 2001, http://thereisnopunchlinehere.com.us/books/weather,faye%20th...
>Sarcasm can be seen as 'inauthentic' and diminish the immediately perceived value of a piece.
I'd rewrite this as such:
"Sarcasm is seen as 'inauthentic' and diminishes the perceived value of the piece."
>the majority of Gen-Y simply can't process more than 140 characters at a time.
I'd strike 'simply'. It's unnecessarily condescending.
>post-2000
Didn't like it when I wrote^H^H^H^H^Hread it and don't like it now. Clumsy. More forced than I'm comfortable with.
There's the chance someone would agree with the grand/parent ('malfunction...', secure, etc.), read my comment, and think... well that's ridiculous.
Case study for "'/s' considered harmful"; Would-be PhDs take note.