>Q: And [who owns the copyright to DeepDream images], according to [my law school mentor]?
>A: Basically, "no one does," because AIs don't have legal personhood.
Wait, what? So if you build a tool that helps you build the final product, the tool counts as the creator, since the tool doesn't have legal personhood? Do we argue that easels and spirographs don't have legal personhood so if you use that stuff in your work then no one has the copyright?
Reminds me of the quip: "Dismissing a graphic artist's work because it was computer-generated is like dismissing Michaelangelo's work because it was brush-generated."