They both appear to claim that the alarms were caused by too-heavy processing loads: " This was the action taken by the Executive program if its resources were exceeded. If a job could not be scheduled because no "core sets" were available, the Executive called BAILOUT with alarm code 1202. If no "VAC areas" were available, BAILOUT was called with alarm code 1201."

vs "The result was that the computer was being asked to perform all of its normal functions for landing while receiving an extra load of spurious data which used up 15% of its time. The computer (or rather the software in it) was smart enough to recognize that it was being asked to perform more tasks than it should be performing. It then sent out an alarm, which meant to the astronaut, “I’m overloaded with more tasks than I should be doing at this time and I’m going to keep only the more important tasks; i.e., the ones needed for landing.” "

Hamilton claimed in 1971 that "Due to an error in the checklist manual, the rendezvous radar switch was placed in the wrong position", Eyles says "The problem has also been attributed (including by the author previously) to a "checklist error".

Also if you're going to point out that the Medium article doesn't mention Laning, it seems equally damming that Eyles doesn't mention Hamilton.