With that being said, I am genuinely curious how these 2 things are necessary for you to consider a browser. Are there extensions that I don't have that is crazy for me not to have?
I have very restricted list of sites which I think are good enough my attention and time.
p.s. and I spend 7 8 hour a day sitting and reading material and documents from net.
p.s-2. And I am okey with standard ads.Site owners has right to make living to, and I think using ads-blocker is selfish act.
Site owners have the right to make a living. They do not have a right to waste my bandwidth, damage my hearing, or compromise my security.
> I think using ads-blocker is selfish act
Perhaps, but it's a reaction to the considerably more selfish trend in advertising.
My ad-blocker has been honed for the past 20 years I've been using the web. It's in my head. I just don't see banner-shaped animated objects anymore.
That said, I do block Flash for performance reasons, which also results in getting rid of the worst offenders. The day banners start using CSS animations or god forbid WebGL, I'll probably start blocking them outright.
For me, ad-blocking is necessary from a privacy and security standpoint. It's also nice to speed up page loads, decrease memory/CPU usage, and make websites actually usable. I do tend to disable it on sites that I trust.